Location
The reasons for the
foundation of a new settlement could be varied: security, often combined
with economics, as in the case of the southern fortress towns (Buhen);
cultic and administrative needs (Kahun); political motives seem to have
led Akhenaten to found Akhetaten. The main consideration where to build
was generally proximity to a waterway and height above the floodplains.
Adobe buildings are very vulnerable when brought in prolonged contact with
water, be it seeping groundwater or the rising Nile. But even stone
edifices are in danger of collapsing, above all when their foundations are
as flimsy as those the Egyptians built.
Elevations, as long as they were inhabited, kept above
the slowly rising plains, where the river deposited its silt. When old
houses crumbled, new ones were built on top of the debris. This has been
going on until recent times, when the yearly inundations were stopped by
the Aswan dam. The continuity of settlement during the millenia is one of
the reasons for the scarcity of data about ancient villages and cities, as
excavation is virtually impossible.
Herodotus noticed the elevated position of Egyptian
cities and explained it as follows
Whenever any man of the Egyptians
committed any transgression, he (the Kushite king Shabaka) would never
put him to death, but he gave sentence upon each man according to the
greatness of the wrong-doing, appointing them to work at throwing up an
embankment before that city from whence each man came of those who
committed wrong. Thus the cities were made higher still than before; for
they were embanked first by those who dug the channels in the reign of
Sesostris, and then secondly in the reign of the Ethiopian, and thus
they were made very high: and while other cities in Egypt also stood
high, I think in the town at Bubastis especially the earth was piled up.
Herodotus, Histories II
Project Gutenberg
City quarters
There was little town planning, and what little there
was looked a bit like the hieroglyph for city. But in a number of
cases attempts at rational planning seem to have been made.
Hotepsenusret (Kahun; Ha-Usertesen-hotep as Petrie
called it) was founded by Senusret II in the Fayum and inhabited for about
a century. The outlay of the city itself was rectangular, covering an area
of 350 by 400 metres. It was surrounded by a brick wall and divided into
two parts by another wall. Generally different social classes did not live
in separate city quarters. But here there was a rich residential area,
where a handful of palatial 60 room residences were fifty times as big as
the dwellings in the poorer half of the city.
This part had also a wide street leading to the palace.
The streets all over the city were laid out in approximately straight
lines. The alleys leading to the workers' dwellings ended in culs-de-sac.
The main street was nine metres wide, as opposed to the alleys and streets
in the residential districts which were sometimes as narrow as 1½ metres.
The streets had shallow stone channels running down the middle for
drainage.
Despite the love Egyptians had for gardens, there was
no space left for them inside the walls at Hotepsenusret. The whole area
was covered with streets and one-storeyed mud-brick buildings.
In this Hotepsenusret was very different from
Akhenaten's specially created capital Akhetaten - or at least some parts
of it. There the planners included public open spaces where trees were
planted and inhabitants often had their own private garden plots.
Actually, within the boundaries of Akhetaten there was
mostly empty space. The planners had given the new capital very generous
dimensions; but it was abandoned after only a few of the main government
edifices had been erected. These formed the town centre, while the
residential areas were north-east and south-west of them.
|
The Egyptians rarely
planned much further than keeping a few spaces free for the important
roads of access, setting temple districts apart and erecting an adobe wall
around it all. Even 'planned' cities like Akhetaten were at times a jumble
of houses, alleys and courtyards in what looks like a case of
build-as-build-can.
But plot owners were not free to do as they liked. They
had to take into account their neighbours' rights and wishes and reach an
understanding with them.
I make an undertaking that when I build
my house, which is the western (border) of your house and which lies in
the northern district of Thebes, in The House of the Cow and the borders
of which are as follows: in the south the courtyard of Padineferhotep's
house, in the north the house of Mrs. Tadineferhotep, between them the
King's Road, in the east your house, touched in the south and north by
walls of my house and serving as a retaining wall as long as I shall not
lay any beams on top of it. In the west the house of Pabimut and the
house of Djedhor... that is two houses with the King's Road lying
between them. 
I shall build my house from my southern wall to my northern wall to your
wall, and I shall not insert any wood (beams) into your wall, apart from
the wood of the building which had stood there previously. And I shall
use it as a retaining wall as long as I do not insert any wood into it.
I shall lay my beams from south to north, covering the ground floor. If
I want to build on top of it I shall build my walls mentioned above up
to the wall of your house which will serve as a retaining wall. I shall
leave the light-shaft opposite your two windows at a distance of one mud
brick of the mud bricks which have been laid in the front of your house
opposite your windows.
I shall build north and south of them (the windows) up to your wall and
cover them with a roof from south to north....
If I do not act according to what has been said above, then I shall pay
you 5 pieces of silver, that is 25 stater .... If you hinder my
building, then I will act according to what has been said above without
leaving a light-shaft - without punishment.
Contract between Taheb,
daughter of Padineferhotep, and Pamerakh, son of Djehutiirdis
290 BCE
Translation from 'Pharaos Volk' by T.G.H.James
Even if they liked living
on ground level, Egyptian city dwellers had little choice about adding
further storeys.
Land suitable for building, i.e. above the floodlevel of the Nile and
still reasonably close to the river, was rare. Many Egyptians either
preferred or were forced to live in these crowded conditions. At Akhetaten
where there was no lack of suitable land, some private homes were still
built in the same warren-like fashion.
Temple districts
Temple districts on the
other hand were better planned. The outlay of individual temples was
basically symmetrical. Walls surrounded them. At Hotep-senusret the brick
wall on three sides of the temple was 12 metres thick and lined with
limestone.
Avenues leading through the city to the temple district
were wide, suitable for processions. During recent excavations near the
great pyramids a paved street five metres wide was discovered. Pavement of
streets was rare, generally restricted to the temple complexes themselves.
Originally most temples were surrounded by an empty
space, but over time houses were built right up to the outer temple walls.
These houses decayed and were rebuilt many times over the millennia, with
the result that the ground level of the residential area rose and the
temples which, being built of stone, were not periodically rebuilt,
seemingly sank into the ground.
The temenos, the temple enclosure, could also
have strategic value. At el-Kab the temple was built at the centre of the
town, and its ramparts
could furnish a last shelter for the garrison in case the town itself were
taken by an enemy. At other places (Ombos, Edfu etc) the whole population
lived inside the temple enclosure.
Bigger towns like Memphis or Thebes had a number of
temples which at first were separate, but were interconnected by sphinx
avenues from the 18th dynasty onwards.
Palaces
Royal palaces housed apart
from the pharaoh's main family, his secondary wives, concubines, and their
offspring, also a small army of servants. The whole compound was enclosed
and separate from the rest of the capital, albeit close to suppliers of
services, temples and the seat of the administration.

Unlike the temples which were, at least from the
outside, mainly symmetrical, Egyptian palaces were at times a
conglomeration of functional units not hidden behind a unifying façade,
even when they were built by just one pharaoh and were not the result of
successive builders adding onto an initial building. Akhenaten's palace at
Akhetaten was of this kind, the residence of the royal family was
separated from the main palace by the main avenue, but connected to it by
a bridge. Ay's palace on the other hand -
if we are to believe a wall painting in a tomb - was strictly symmetrical,
and looked as much like a castle as like a palace. |