Greek Temple Architecture


Despite a history of rivalry, wars, and invasions, the Greek people managed to make many important contributions to art. Their accomplishments in architecture, particularly temple architecture, were among their most enduring legacies to Western civilization. As Greek temples became larger and more complex, temple builders began to develop a number of standardized plans. These ranged from simple one to two room structures with columned porches, to multiroomed structures with double porches surrounded by columns. The Doric order and the Ionic order were well developed by about 600 B.C. The Corinthian order, a variation of the Ionic, began to appear around 450 B.C. (Stokstad, pp. 162 - 165)

 

the three orders of decorative style

The Doric order

This was the earliest of the three orders developed by the Greeks. Its principal features include a simple, heavy column without a base, and a broad, plain capital. The column is fluted, but not as deeply as in the other orders. (Stokstad, p. 165)

The Ionic order

This order, with its slender, higher columns, is more elegant than the Doric. In the Ionic order the height is about nine times the diameter of the column at its base (Doric columns have a ratio of five and one-half to one). The flutes on the columns are deeper and closer together and are separated by flat surfaces called "fillets". The column rests on an elaborate base and its most distinguishing feature is the capital which is carved into double spiral, scroll shape that has been likened to the horns of a ram or the leaves of a palm tree. These are called volutes. (Stokstad, p. 165)

The Corinthian order

This order was initially used by the Greeks in interiors but came to be used on temple exteriors as well. This is the most elaborate and lightest of the three orders. It has a base and a capital decorated with acanthus leaves and, sometimes rosettes, and they often have volutes at the corners. (Stokstad, p. 165) In Roman times it was the standard capital for almost any purpose. (Janson, p. 178)

 

The Doric order

Corner of the "Basilica," c. 550 B.C., Paestum, Italy







The "Temple of Poseidon," c. 460 B.C., Paestum, Italy







The Parthenon, 448 - 432 B.C., Acropolis, Athens

 





The Ionic order

Propylaea, 437 - 432 B.C., Acropolis, Athens








This early ancestor, or relative (c. 600 B.C.), of the Ionic capital is from Larissa (in modern-day Turkey). "It may well be that the Ionic column... had its ultimate source in Egypt, but instead of reaching Greece by sea, as we suppose the proto-Doric column did, it traveled a slow and tortuous path by land through Syria and Asia Minor." (Janson, p. 177)



Archaeological Museum, Istanbul
 

The Erechtheum (view from the south), 421 - 405 B.C., Acropolis, Athens






The Athenian architects who took up the Ionic order about 450 B.C. thought of it, at first, as suitable only for small temples of a simple plan. Such a building is the little temple of Athena Nike on the southern flank of the Propylaea, probably built 427 - 424 B.C., from a design prepared twenty years earlier..." (Janson, p. 177)

 

The National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

 




The Corinthian order

 

Corinthian capital from the Tholos at Epidaurus, c. 350 B.C.






Museum, Epidaurus
 

The Monument of Lysicrates, c. 334 B.C., Athens

This is the earliest known instance of a Corinthian capital replacing the Ionic order on an exterior column.


Information provided by: http://www.bullis.org