Architecture
Architecture is probably the oldest of the
fine arts. Certainly it is the most useful and in some respects is a
prerequisite for the other arts. Most early sacred texts associate buildings
with deities; architecture was not only considered the highest art form, to
which other arts were adornments, but some buildings were viewed as
representing another, higher realm. In medieval illuminated manuscripts, God
was frequently shown armed with compasses and a mason's square, as Architect
of the Universe.
Architecture can be defined in at least four
ways, all valid, all interrelated, and none truly satisfactory. It is the
art and method of erecting structures; it is a planned entity, the result of
a conscious act; it is a body or corpus of work; it is a way to build. A
good definition was provided by the Roman architect Vitruvius in the 1st
century AD and was translated from the Latin into English during the 17th
century by Sir Henry Wotton (1568-1639). Vitruvius said that architecture
was a building that incorporated utilitas, firmitas, and venustas, which
Wotton translated as "commodotie, firmness, and delighte." This definition
recognizes that architecture embraces functional, technological, and
aesthetic requirements: it must have commodotie (utilitarian qualities),
firmness (structural stability and sound construction), and delighte
(attractive appearance). Because the history of architecture concerns
buildings substantial enough to survive (at least in part) or important
enough to be recorded in some way (by drawings or written description), in
practice it has been the history of significant buildings, and major
institutional monuments.
This discussion will concentrate on the
development of Western architecture. Nonwestern architecture, as well as
more detailed consideration of each epoch in Western architecture, are
treated elsewhere in the encyclopedia and may be found by culture, by
country, by style, by type, by architect, and by building or monument.
..Architects
..The Study of Architecture
..Architectural History
..Ancient Egyptian and Near
Eastern Architecture
..Greek Architecture
..Roman Architecture
..Byzantine Architecture
..Romanesque Architecture
..Gothic Architecture
..Renaissance Architecture
..Baroque and Rococo
Architecture
..The Age of Revivals
..Modern Architecture
Much more is known of ancient buildings than
of the people who designed and built them. The names of a few Egyptian,
Greek, and Roman architects have survived, but the identities of the great
cathedral builders of the Middle Ages are mostly unknown. They are generally
described as master masons, but they regarded themselves as architects and
sometimes incorporated a labyrinth in their own memorial plaques to signify
a link with Daedalus, the legendary first architect of the Greek world and
the designer of the labyrinth of the Minotaur.
The names of architects first began to be
known in Italy during the renaissance in the 15th and 16th centuries. The
idea of a professional architect with formal training and academic
qualifications is a product of the 19th century. In 1819 architecture
courses were instituted at the ecole des beaux- arts (School of Fine Arts)
in Paris; in 1847 a night school was established at the Architectural
Association in London; courses in architecture were first offered at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1868, at Cornell University in
1871, and at the University of Illinois in 1873. Until World War I, however,
most architects were trained while working in the offices of practicing
architects, and governments were slow to insist upon qualification tests.
The state of Illinois passed the first licensing law for architects in 1897;
Great Britain did not have such a law until 1931.
Just as the architect as a professional is a
recent phenomenon, so too is the evaluation of architecture itself. Not
until the late 18th century did ancient Greek and Roman architecture cease
to be regarded as an unassailable criterion of excellence throughout the
Western world. Only when the hegemony of the classical styles began to be
challenged did architects and scholars begin to consider the whole of the
subject. The traditional approach was based on a closely observed study of
architectural style, with considerable emphasis on the differences of detail
treatment from one country to another.
An alternate approach based on determinism
has been developed over many years by a group of German-speaking scholars
(including Jakob Burckhardt, Siegfried Giedion, Sir Nikolaus Pevsner, and
Heinrich Wolfflin) who established an interpretation of architecture as an
expression of the Zeitgeist, or spirit of the age. Burckhardt and Wolfflin
introduced the Zeitgeist concept in their studies of the Italian
Renaissance, but Giedion and Pevsner applied it to Modern Architecture,
which they saw as expressing the spirit of a technological era. Another
approach seeks to understand architecture in the same way as did the people
who built it. During the 19th century this associative school of thought
became central to architectural theory. Contemporary architects and scholars
emphasize the influences of technology on the development of buildings. The
use of iron and steel beams and columns released the wall from its
traditional load-bearing function and allowed architects to incorporate
enormous windows and wide, open-plan floors, two of the most significant
characteristics of modern architecture. No large modern building, however,
would be practicable without the parallel development of the elevator,
central ventilation and heating, and electric lighting devices.
Architecture is most readily grasped by
studying its development in successive historical periods, noting the
general characteristic of each, the development of building techniques from
one era to the next as well as from one culture to the next, and noting the
evolution of each successive architectural style. Following are brief
summaries of the ten major cultural epochs in Western architecture from
ancient Egypt and the Near East to the present time.
The construction of the most famous Egyptian
structures, the pyramids, began in the 3d and 4th Dynasties of the Old
Kingdom (c.2686-2498 BC). Temples in stone were built during the Middle
Kingdom (c.2133-1786 BC), but most of the surviving examples date from the
New Kingdom (1570-1085 BC) and the Ptolemaic Period (323-30 BC). Permanent
building in stone was restricted to the tomb, temple, and the associated
statuary (obelisk and avenues of sphinx and lion), but the forms of these
monumental stone structures seem to have been influenced by those of
primitive Egyptian domestic architecture. Houses were formed of mud-brick
walls with columns made from bundles of reeds lashed together. Thus, the
walls of stone buildings were generally battered (thicker at the base and
tapered), and the columns were short in proportion, seldom more than six
times their diameters. The column heads or capitals were carved to represent
lotus flowers or buds, palm leaves, and papyrus heads; the column shafts
often had decorative bindings recalling the primitive lashed reeds.
Stone and timber were rare in the alluvial
plains of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers; so Mesopotamian Architecture was
necessarily based on the use of clay brick with an outer skin of often
highly colored glazed bricks, exemplified by the Ziggurat at Ur (c.2500 BC).
Farther up the Mesopotamian rivers in Assyria, stone was available, but it
was used primarily as a wall covering to be decorated with Bas-Relief
sculpture and inscriptions, from which much of the knowledge of Assyrian
history is derived. The architecture of both the Babylonian (c.1900-c.1550
BC) and the Assyrian empires (c.1100-612 BC) was based on massive brick
platforms raised above the floodplain and often further terraced to give the
characteristic ziggurat form. The ancient Persian Empire (538-333 BC)
adopted these features and supplemented them with the extensive use of
columns, as in the palaces at Persepolis (518-c.460 BC)
Any consideration of Greek architecture must
begin with mention of Aegean Civilization, typified by the great Minoan
palaces on the island of Crete, in particular the huge complex of Knossos
and the magnificently sited structures at Phaistos (both c.1700 -c.1400 BC).
Constructed of massive masonry, they were several stories high and
incorporated large pillared halls, dozens of labyrinthine smaller rooms,
sweeping terraces looking to the sea, and plumbing arrangements of
astonishing modernity. The walls were decorated with brilliantly colored
frescoes and stucco bas-reliefs. The Minoans were conquered by the
Mycenaeans of mainland Greece, whose architecture was subsequently strongly
influenced by Cretan prototypes.
This early Greek architecture (3000-700 BC)
is characterized by the use of massive stone blocks for walls and by the
occasional use of corbeled masonry to make primitive forms of vaults and
domes, as in the Lion Gate and so-called Treasury of Atreus at Mycenae
(1400-1200 BC). Columns sometimes were also used to frame doors and gateways
and to provide internal colonnades for palaces, as in the courtyard at
Tiryns. It was, however, the column and the beam--Post And Lintel--that
formed the basis of classical Greek architecture and that give it the
simple, straightforward character that, together with its details, has led
many scholars to speculate on its origins in the construction of primitive
wooden huts.
The Greeks developed a vocabulary of
architectural detail in stone that was fundamental to European architecture
for more than 2,000 years. The Greek "language of architecture" reached its
zenith during the 5th century BC. Classical Greek architecture consisted of
three orders--the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. Each represented the
assembly of the basic components of a simple rectangular building with a
pitched roof, that is, column, capital (or column head), entablature (the
"beam" connecting the columns), and pediment the triangular gable of the
roof). Different proportions and decorative conventions imparted a
distinctive character to each order, regardless of the bright colors applied
to the original buildings or the subject matter of the sculptured decoration
along the frieze or in the triangular pediment (tympanum). The proportions
of each order were fixed within narrow limits, and, strictly speaking, the
components of each order could be correctly assembled in only one way. The
Greeks never mixed different orders on the same building. This, and other
rules, were modified in Roman architecture. The Romans created two
additional orders, the Tuscan and the Composite, and employed all five
orders as decoration for buildings constructed on principles different from
those the Greeks used.
The basic building material of the classical
period was marble, a strong stone that could be shaped to give great
precision of line and detail. The basic temple form was also very simple: a
rectangular chamber with a shallow-pitched gabled roof, surrounded by a row
of columns (or fronted by a columned porch), standing on a podium of three
steps. Given the simplicity of the construction system and the building
form, the essential achievement of the Greeks was the refinement of the
building and its components into an architectural system of proportion and
decoration--exemplified by the buildings on the Athens Acropolis, in
particular the Parthenon (447-32 BC)--that remained the basis of the Western
European architectural tradition until the mid-19th century.
During the 2d century BC the Romans, in
conquering North Africa, Greece, Anatolia, and Spain, absorbed the
architectural traditions of those areas (most significantly that of Greece),
to which they added the constructional skills of the Etruscans, their
immediate neighbors in central Italy. The most significant achievements of
the Romans were in their technology of building, their use of a much wider
range of materials (including concrete, terra-cotta, and fired bricks), and
their refinements of the arch and vault and the dome--all of which had been
pioneered by the Etruscans. Roman temples generally remained modeled on
those of Greece, with the common addition of a high plinth (base or
platform) and the frequent omission of the side and rear columns, typified
by the Maison Carre at Nimes, France.
Roman civic monuments included a number of
building types of unprecedented size and complexity, which could not have
been built using the Greek beam-and-column construction system. The
Aqueduct, thermae (such as the Baths of Caracalla), Basilica (law court),
theater, Triumphal Arch, amphitheater (such as the Colosseum), circuses, and
palaces involved enclosing much larger spaces or bridging much greater
distances than could be achieved by the use of timber or stone beams. The
Roman use of domed construction in mass concrete is best represented by the
well-preserved Pantheon in Rome (constructed AD 120-24), which subsequently
became a Christian church. Later Roman or Early Christian churches, however,
generally took their form from the basilica, whose central nave, side
aisles, triforium, and apse became characteristic features of the Romanesque
and Gothic church. Emperor Constantine I built huge basilican churches at
all the major Christian sites in the Roman Empire in the 4th century, thus
firmly establishing the basilica as the predominant form of Christian church
architecture.
Byzantine architecture developed in the
Byzantine Empire founded by Constantine I when he moved the capital from
Rome to Byzantium (subsequently Constantinople--present-day Istanbul) in the
4th century. In southern and eastern Europe, in particular in those parts of
Italy, Greece, and Anatolia that remained under the sway of the Byzantine
Empire, the continuity of Roman plans and techniques was strong. Only
slightly modified Roman basilican plans were used for such Italian churches
as Sant' Apollinare in Classe, Ravenna (534-39); in Constantinople itself
huge domed churches, such as Hagia Sophia (532-37), were built on a scale
far larger than anything achieved by the Western Roman Empire.
In northern Europe, where Roman remains were
less frequently encountered, greater freedom of experiment existed in
Merovingian, Carolingian, and Ottonian architecture, as the early periods
are known. From the mid-10th to the mid-12th century greater progress was
made toward the development of a successor style--the Gothic. The primary
characteristics of Romanesque architecture (or Norman architecture, as
northern Romanesque is often known) were Roman in origin, however: large
internal spaces were spanned by barrel vaults on thick, squat columns and
piers, windows and doors had round-headed arches, and most of the major
churches were laid out on the basilican plan, modified by the addition of
the buttress, transept, and tower. The buildings are solid, heavy, and,
because of the comparatively small windows, dimly lighted, exemplified by
Durham Cathedral (begun 1023) in England. Portals, capitals, and altars are
embellished with sculpture of superlative skill and powerful effect; stained
glass first appeared in Europe, but on a limited scale, because of the
restricted size of window openings.
From the mid-12th century to the 16th century
northern European architecture was characterized by the use of flying
buttresses, pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and traceried windows. The thin
walls, slender columns, and the very large areas of glass in Gothic
buildings gave an impression of lightness that contrasted markedly with the
Romanesque. Gothic architecture originated at the royal abbey church of St.
Denis, built by Abbot Suger between 1137 and 1144. It was refined in the
great churches of northern and central France, such as Amiens Cathedral
(1220-70), notable for its great height and the slenderness of its columns,
and the Sainte-Chapelle in Paris (1247-48), in which exceptionally large
wall areas were filled with glass and tracery. Indeed, Gothic architecture
was most fully developed in France and England, where the style spread in
the late 12th century. The spread of Gothic to Germany was delayed until the
mid-13th century, and in this country only a few cathedrals, such as the one
in Cologne (begun 1248), approached the size and quality of the northern
French prototypes. The most thorough application of northern Gothic to Italy
was in the Milan Cathedral, built at the end of the 14th century by French
and German masons. In general, the Italians tended to use Gothic as a
decorative feature rather than as a total building system.
Many Gothic secular buildings survive, some
of the finest examples being the Bruges Town Hall (1376-1420) in Belgium,
the Palazzo Pubblico (begun 1298) in Siena, Italy, and the Pont Valentre
(early 14th century) in Cahors, France. The greatest concentration of Gothic
secular buildings is in Belgium, in what was then the most prosperous part
of northwest Europe.
During the early 15th century, European
culture became inspired by the rediscovery, known as the Renaissance, of
classical literature, art, and architecture. Italy was the center of this
rebirth, and in Florence, where the movement started, architecture was
influenced by the use of the orders, the round arch, the barrel vault, and
the dome--all Roman features. In northern Europe, where Gothic continued to
flourish well into the 16th century, the Renaissance at first made only a
superficial impact and was for a much longer time confined to decorative
changes. In both France and England a truly classical style was not
established until the first half of the 17th century: in France by Francois
Mansart and in England by Inigo Jones.
The Florentine Renaissance did not initially
mean the complete break with traditional practice that was implied in the
Gothic north. For the church of Santo Spirito (begun c.1436), Filippo
Brunelleschi used a basilican plan, round arches, and a flat ceiling; but
these traditional Italian Romanesque elements were combined with a new sense
of proportion, the use of Corinthian columns, and a dome over the crossing
of nave and transepts. Brunelleschi's later design for the vast, still
unfinished cathedral of Santa Maria degli Angeli (also called the Duomo of
Florence) took the form of a domed octagon with eight radiating chapels, a
centralized plan that became the ideal among his contemporaries in Florence
(Leon Battista Alberti and Michelozzo) and his followers in Rome.
There, during the 16th century, a more
monumental version of the style was developed by Donato Bramante, Raphael,
and Michelangelo, as in their various plans for Saint Peter's Basilica.
In the 15th century Florentine architecture
relied for effect upon proportion, simple straight lines, and the correct
use of classical details. During the 16th century, however, architects such
as Michelangelo and Giulio Romano abandoned this restraint for a more
exciting, idiosyncratic version of the style, now called Mannerism, in which
the classical rules were deliberately flouted for effect. Giovanni Lorenzo
Bernini and Francesco Borromini further developed the style by introducing
curvilinear forms and by incorporating sculpture and painting in their
buildings to give a rich and dynamic version, known as Baroque, which spread
during the 17th and 18th centuries from Rome to much of southern Europe and
to South America. In northern Europe, especially in Austria and Germany,
baroque architecture achieved an exuberance and freedom unmatched elsewhere,
climaxing in the Rococo, as in the Wurzburg Residenz in West Germany. In
France baroque and rococo were tempered by Neoclassicism, with a resultant
elegance and refinement in both architecture and decoration, exemplified by
the 18th-century sections of the palace of Versailles. The spread of
neoclassical architecture during the 17th and 18th centuries was due in no
small measure to the illustrated books that brought it to the attention of
educated patrons. Although fine architecture has never been created by
untalented architects, the rules of the classical orders enforced systematic
convention in design that enabled many moderately competent architects to
produce well-proportioned and finely detailed buildings. In part this
explains the extraordinary success of the Palladian interpretation of
Romanized Greek architecture. It was, for example, the source of almost all
country-house building in England during the 18th century, as well as of
numerous mansions, courthouses, state capitols, and universities along the
eastern seaboard of North America.
During the late 18th and 19th centuries,
Europe and America witnessed a series of stylistic revivals. The period was
dominated by the proponents of the classical (themselves split between
"Greeks" and "Romans") and the northern Gothic. Buildings were also designed
in self-conscious imitation of Byzantine, Oriental, Egyptian, Venetian
Gothic, and Florentine Renaissance architecture, however. This was not, of
course, the first time that ancient styles had been revived; the Italians of
the 15th century and the architects of Charlemagne's court in the 9th
century had incorporated classical motifs in their buildings. Both the
revived classical and the Gothic Revival, however, were essentially
different from the architecture that inspired them.
The country mansion of England and colonial
America bore a classical portico, but it was attached to a type of building
never seen in ancient Rome or Greece. The revived Gothic applied during the
19th century to private houses, office buildings, railroad stations,
hospitals, and waterworks was by no means the same as the Gothic
architecture of the northern medieval cathedrals. New engineering techniques
and modern materials--in particular in cast-iron architecture--removed many
of the age-old practical constraints on building design. Rapid urban growth
during the 19th century produced a great many fine and essentially original
buildings, the quality of which is only beginning to be appreciated.
Contemporary architecture takes a bewildering
variety of forms and makes use of a far wider range of materials than ever
before. The International Style, promulgated by Walter Gropius, Le
Corbusier, and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe in theory and practice, has
dominated architecture in this century until very recently. Most of the
earlier buildings by these architects were small private houses, usually
rectangular, with undecorated walls, flat roofs, and large areas of glass
set in metal frames. Conscious avoidance of any previous styles or
recognizable antecedents was combined with highly sophisticated
proportioning to achieve sleek, elegant structures, such as Mies's German
Pavilion for the 1929 Barcelona Exhibition. To the dismay of its
originators, the International Style was enthusiastically adopted by far
lesser talents and profit- minded builders to produce numerous "modern"
office buildings, apartment complexes, hospitals, and motels all over the
world.
Not all contemporary architects subscribed to
Mies's dictum of "less is more," and hence their work is difficult to
classify as "modern."
Frank Lloyd Wright, probably the outstanding
native American architect of this century, Kenzo Tange of Japan, Alvar Aalto
of Finland, and the Finnish-Americans Eliel and Eero Saarinen produced many
buildings of great beauty and originality.
Although some of their work does reflect the
International Style, most of their buildings are instantly recognizable in
their individuality, as were the great buildings of the past. In short,
these architects and others like them seem to be part of a continuing
architectural tradition rejected by the practitioners of the International
Style.
The social turmoil of the 1960s was
emphatically reflected in architecture. Complexity and Contradiction in
Modern Architecture (1968) by the architect Robert Venturi was a revolt
against the ubiquitous glass boxes of the modernists, and it signaled the
emergence of Postmodern Architecture. Since that time, architects have found
new strength in the traditions of the past, as well as in the vernacular
architecture seen all about them.
Note: the following has been
abstracted from the Grolier Encyclopedia.
|