by Johann Strauss Jr.'s
In
1919, H.L.Menken wrote
“The waltz never quite
goes out of fashion;
it is always just around
the corner;
every now and then it
returns with a bang . . .
It is sneaking, insidious, disarming, lovely. . . .
The waltz, in fact, is magnificently improper..
the art of tone turned lubricious. . .
In
1919, H.L.Menken wrote
“The
waltz never quite goes out of fashion;
it is always just around the corner;
every now and then it returns with a bang . . .
It is sneaking, insidious, disarming, lovely. . . .
The waltz, in fact, is magnificently improper..
the art of tone turned lubricious. . .
Austrian
music scholar, Max Graf, wrote,
“If there exists a form of music
that is a direct expression of sensuality,
it is the Viennese Waltz...."
The
WALTZ was a smash hit from the very start, mesmerizing its listeners into
non-stop revelry. The waltz swept out of Germany in the middle of the
eighteenth century to conquer all of Europe, inspiring an old German verse:
“Whosoever the dance did discover/Had in mind each maid and lover/With
all their burning ardor.”
The
name of the waltz is taken from the Italian ‘volver’ - to turn, or revolve.
It was an outgrowth of the ländler, a country dance in three-quarter time,
and replaced the heavy hopping and jumping movements with more polished
and graceful gliding.
It
was, indeed, rural lads and lasses who first found these whirling steps
so appealing. And so, the waltz originally was decidedly low-brow and
provincial. In those days, there was something unsavory about a woman
being gripped in a man’s embrace while whirling in a frenzy around the
dance floor.
The
close contact with one’s partners body contrasted sharply with the stately
dances of the aristocracy - the minuets, polonaises, and quadrilles -
in which one kept one’s distance. A first-hand account of a village dance
in the latter part of the eighteenth century read “The men dancers held
up the dresses of their partners very high so that they should not trail
and be stepped on, wrapped themselves both tightly in the covering, bringing
their bodies as closely together as possible, and thus whirling about
went on in the most indecent positions....
As
they waltzed around on the darker side of the room, the kissing and the
hugging became still bolder. It is the custom of the country, I know,
and not as bad as it looks, but I can quite understand why the waltz has
been banned in parts of Swabia and Switzerland.”
Naturally,
the scandalized upper classes could not endure to have the lower classes
having all the fun, and so, in time, the waltz finally achieved a degree
of legitimacy, yet not losing any of its basic appeal.
The
Austrian music scholar, Max Graf, has written, “If there exists a form
of music that is a direct expression of sensuality, it is the Viennese
Waltz. It was the dance of the new Romantic Period after the Napoleonic
Wars, and the contemporaries of the first waltzes were highly shocked
at the eroticism of this dance in which a lady clung to her partner, closed
her eyes as in a happy dream, and glided off as if the world had disappeared.
The new waltz melodies overflowed with longing, desire and tenderness.”
These
new waltz melodies could trace their ancestry back to the beer gardens
of early eighteenth century Vienna, and to the rural inns and tavern situated
on the outskirts of Vienna and on the banks of the Danube River. Traveling
orchestras, some of them from the ships and barges that plied the Danube,
whetted the Viennese appetite for this new dance, and the waltz craze
soon reached epidemic proportions.
Into
this dance-mad atmosphere stepped Josef Lanner and Johann Strauss the
elder, both band musicians and both at one time members of the same orchestra.
In the compositions of these two men the waltz gained sophistication and
a distinctly Viennese light-hearted spirit.
A
contemporary music critic, Eduard Hanslick, wrote that “You cannot imagine
the wild enthusiasm that these two men created in Vienna. Newspapers went
into raptures over each new waltz, and innumerable articles appeared about
Lanner and Strauss.” And
when he visited he city in 1845, the composer Hector Berlioz, too, was
struck with the passion for the waltz . “The Viennese youth abandons itself
to its passion for dancing, a very real and delightful passion, which
has led the Viennese to make a very real art of drawing-room dancing as
far above the routine of our balls as the orchestra and waltzes of Strauss
are superior to the polkas and strummers in the dancing salons of Paris.
I have passed whole nights watching thousands on incomparable waltzers
whirling about . . ."
Until
his death in 1899 kept Europe whirling in blissful abandon. Even in 1919,
H.L.Menken wrote: “The waltz never quite goes out of fashion; it is always
just around the corner; every now and then it returns with a bang . .
. It is sneaking, insidious, disarming, lovely. . . .The waltz, in fact,
is magnificently improper-the art of tone turned lubricious. . . . There
is something about a waltz that is irresistible. Try it on the fattest
and sedatest or even on the thinnest and most acidulous of women, and
she will be ready, in ten minutes, for a stealthy smack behind the door-nay,
she will forthwith impart the embarrassing news that her husband misunderstands
her and drinks too much and is going to Cleveland, O. on a business trip
tomorrow.”
Yes,
the waltz is irresistible-and exceptionally durable. In a world where the
Mosh and the Monkey are popular social dances, and the macarena, line dances,
and the chicken dance sometimes seem to be the only alternatives, the waltz
still holds on tenaciously to a small part of our dancing lives, for its
lilting strains never fail to evoke three pleasure dearest to the heart
of civilized man – wine, women, and song! |