|
This process was introduced in 1851 and marks a watershed in photography.
Up till then the two processes in use were the daguerreotype and
the calotype. Daguerreotypes were better than calotypes in terms
of detail and quality, but could not be reproduced; calotypes were reproducible,
but suffered from the fact that any print would also show the imperfections
of the paper.
The search began, then, for a process which would combine the best of
both processes - the ability to reproduce fine detail and the capacity
to make multiple prints. The ideal would have been to coat light sensitive
material on to glass, but the chemicals would not adhere without a suitable
binder which obviously had to be clear. At first, Albumen (the
white of an egg) was used. Then in 1851 Frederick Scott Archer
came across collodion.
Collodion was a viscous liquid - guncotton dissolved in ether and alcohol
- which had only been invented in 1846, but which quickly found a use
during the Crimean war; when it dried it formed a very thin clear film,
which was ideal for dressing and protecting wounds. (One can still obtain
this today, for painting over a cut). Collodion was just the answer as
far as photography was concerned, for it would provide the binding which
was so badly needed. Lewis Carroll, himself a photographer who
used collodion, described the process in a poem he called "Hiawatha's
Photography."
"First a piece
of glass he coated
With Collodion, and plunged it
In a bath of Lunar Caustic
Carefully dissolved in water;
There he left it certain minutes.
Secondly my Hiawatha
Made with cunning hand a mixture
Of the acid Pyro-gallic,
And the Glacial Acetic,
And of alcohol and water:
This developed all the picture.
Finally he fixed each picture
With a saturate solution
Of a certain salt of Soda...."
This "soda" was,
of course, hypo. Sometimes potassium cyanide was used, the advantage of
this being that the solutions could be washed out by rinsing under a tap
for a minute or so, whereas hypo would need much more washing time.
The collodion process
had several advantages.
- being more sensitive
to light than the calotype process, it reduced the exposure times drastically
- to as little as two or three seconds. This opened up a new dimension
for photographers, who up till then had generally to portray very still
scenes or people.
- because a glass
base was used, the images were sharper than with a calotype.
- because the process
was never patented, photography became far more widely used.
- the price of a
paper print was about a tenth of that of a daguerreotype.
There was however
one main disadvantage: the process was by no means an easy one. First
the collodion had to be spread carefully over the entire plate. The plate
then had to be sensitised, exposed and developed whilst the plate was
still wet; the sensitivity dropped once the collodion had dried. It is
often known as the wet plate collodion process for this reason.
The process was labour-intensive enough in a studio's darkroom, but quite
a feat if one wanted to do some photography on location. Some took complete
darkroom tents, Fenton took a caravan, and it is no mere coincidence
that many photographs taken in this period happened to be near rivers
or streams! Moreover, at this time there were no enlargements, so if one
wanted large prints, there was no alternative but to carry very large
cameras. (It is such limitations of the process that make the work of
people like the Bisson brothers, Fenton, and others so remarkable).
One might also mention the safety factor. The collodion mixture was not
only inflammable but highly explosive. It is reported that several photographers
demolished their darkrooms and homes, some even losing their lives, as
a result of careless handling of the photographic chemicals.
Despite the advantages the collodion process offered, there were still
many who stoutly defended the calotype. A writer in the Journal of the
Photographic Society (December 1856) wrote:
"for subjects where
texture, gradations of tint and distance are required, there is nothing....
to compare with a good picture from calotype or waxed paper negative."
Moreover, the calotype
process was less of an ordeal, especially for travel photographers;
paper negatives could be prepared at home, exposed on location, and then
developed upon one's return. Hence Diamond used the calotype process
for some of his travel photographs, though he used collodion for portraiture
and for his medical photography.
Nevertheless the invention of this process turned out to be a watershed
as far as photography was concerned:
- cheaper alternatives,
such as Ambrotypes and Tintypes were developed. The former
was a positive on glass, the latter a positive on metal;
- stereoscopic
photography began to flourish;
- the carte-de-visite
craze started;
- because of the
faster speed of the process, the analysis of movement became possible.
The use of collodion
caught on very quickly indeed, and within a few years few people used
either the Daguerreotype or Calotype process.
The records of the Photographic Society give an interesting account
of the efforts to ensure even sensitivity of the Collodion plates. As
mentioned above, these plates had to be dipped into a nitrate of silver
bath and exposed whilst still wet. Exposure would have to be almost immediate
as otherwise the top of the plate would lose its moisture and the sensitivity
would become uneven. All sorts of liquids were tried, including honey,
beer, and even rasperry syrup!
A variation on this was the Oxymel process.
By Dr. Robert
Leggat
|