|
I
was born on April 6, 1949 in a regional hospital in Frankfurt am Main
in Germany. Having the umbilical cord wrapped twice tightly around my
neck, my parents' fear for the mental health of their first-born son subsided
only gradually.
My forefathers had
been farmers, inn-keepers, blacksmiths, carpenters and shop keepers in
the region. My mother, an elementary school teacher, and my father, having
finished an apprenticeship, had been married during the previous year,
shortly after a devastating war. Opening a store for interior decoration
in my father's home town of Sprendlingen, they were trying to build an
existence and start a family at the same time. Eighteen months later a
brother, Heinz, was born without the umbilical complications.
Sprendlingen, today a part of Dreieich, just south of Frankfurt, was a
town of some 15,000 inhabitants. I was raised in the circle of an extended
family of four uncles and aunts, who, together with my parents, lived
in two houses with barns and sheds and the store surrounding a large yard.
It was an ideal playground for two boys growing up with their cousins
- this group always extended by a horde of friends. Constructing huge
sand castles with moats and bridges, cardboard tents from the shop's packing
material, building elaborate knight's armour from scrap floor-covering
and intricate race tracks for marbles from curtain rails remain fond memories
of childhood.
I began kindergarten at age three and was soon after joined by my brother.
The kindergarten's seemingly unlimited amount of toy building blocks must
have fascinated me and I soon became somewhat of the establishment's chief
architect. School, at six, was a happy time, complemented in the afternoons
by playing soccer in our yard, roaming about the fields surrounding my
home town, and building dozens of detailed cardboard model ships and airplanes
from "Ausschneidebogen".
There was never a doubt in my parents' mind that their sons would receive
the best possible education. Although none of my forefathers graduated
from high school, my parents regarded highly the merits of a good education
as a tool for social advancement. In their value system knowledge always
ranked above wealth - although not rejecting a possible fortuitous marriage
of both. To enter "Gymnasium", at ten, required the passing of a test.
I was accepted and from then on commuted for eight years, five km each
way, to the "Goethe Gymnasium" in the neighboring town of Neu Isenburg.
Gymnasium was hard.
I was not a particularly good student. I loved mathematics and the sciences,
but I barely scraped by in German and English and French. Receiving an
"F" in either of these subjects always loomed over my head and kept me
many a year at the brink of having to repeat a level. Luckily there was
"Ausgleich", balancing a bad grade in one subject with a good grade in
another. Mathematics and later physics got me through school without repeat
performance. I also excelled in sports, particularly in track and field,
where I won a school championship in the 50m dash. But sports could not
be used for "Ausgleich".
One of my teachers stood out, Mr. Nick. He taught math and physics. A
new teacher, basically straight out of college, young, open, articulate,
fun, he represented what teachers could be like. His love and curiosity
for the subjects he was teaching was contagious. As 15 or 16 year-olds,
we read sections of Feynman's Lecture Notes in Physics in a voluntary
afternoon course he offered. Having mastered wooden building blocks and
cardboard models, passed erector sets and toy trains, I had reached the
level of "Elektro-Mann" and "Radio-Mann". Dozens of telephones and light
boxes to communicate between the sheds at home were designed, constructed,
improved, and mercilessly wrecked, possibly foreshadowing my later employment
by a communications company. And then, of course, there was chemistry,
a subject I did not appreciate in school, but it held the secrets for
making explosives. I built a rocket that propelled a modified car of a
toy train into the air. After several exhilarating launches, the rocket
exploded in my hand and ripped off half my right thumb. I learned an important
lesson: a rocket and a bomb differ only in the exhaust. Affecting me somewhat
during adolescence, the missing thumb also relieved me from army duty.
Today, it is only an unimportant, physical curiosity.
I always wanted to become a physicist. Supposedly, at age six, I had told
just that to a technician, who was repairing a TV set in our home. Obviously,
I had little clue as to what a physicist did. Nevertheless, the goal persisted
all through high school, but suddenly got overthrown during the last year
of "Gymnasium" when an art teacher discovered my talent for design. I
passed my baccalaureate with average grades - quite good in the sciences
but quite poor in the humanities - and started to study architecture at
the Technical High School in Darmstadt, about 20 km south of my home town.
Being too late at application time, I had to register for "Lehrfach für
Bauwesen", a related subject, that consisted of similar freshmen courses
as architecture. I turned out to be very good in making any technical
drawing of a bird cage from any requested angle, but very poor in freehand
drawing and decided that architecture was not for me. Instead I went on
to pursue my true love - physics.
As with architecture in Darmstadt, I was too late for registration in
physics at the Goethe University in Frankfurt and took up mathematics
instead, transferring to physics the following year. The year was 1968.
Student revolts swept the campuses from Berkeley to Berlin. Frankfurt
was a major site for riots in the streets and in the lecture halls. For
a young student, hardly familiar with university life, largely ignorant
of the aim of the different protests, these were uncertain times. Legitimate
educational reform requests became confused with larger political issues
leading to absurd happenings around campus. Damage was done to the institution
of the university and its teaching staff but, at the same time, 1968 marked
the beginning of a gradual and rational reform.
Studying physics and mathematics was wonderful. It was a far cry from
Gymnasium. I loved the rigor of mathematics. In physics we had fascinating
beginners lectures by two descendants of the famous "Pohl School" of Gottingen,
Prof. Martienssen and Prof. Queisser. I had joined a group of likeminded
students that studied together and hung out in "Café Bauer" for relaxation.
Life was good, until I took the "Vordiplom", the major exam in all courses
at the end of the fourth semester.
All physics and math exams - some six to eight written or verbal tests
- went very well. They went so well, that I thought I needn't study at
all for the dreaded verbal chemistry test. With straight "A"s in physics
and mathematics, what was the chemistry professor to do but let me pass?
I was mistaken and flunked badly, requiring all tests to be taken again,
six months, later. Thankfully, physics and math professors - some having
had experiences of their own with chemistry tests - conspired and promised
to maintain my grades in those subjects. It gave me six months, to study
nothing but chemistry. I never felt more confident walking into an exam
and succeeded getting an "A" in chemistry. I had been wary of the field
of chemistry throughout high school and during much of my studies. Counting
valences and bonds, memorizing dozens of exceptions to the rules and hundreds
of arcane compounds never made much sense to me. I came to revise my attitude
towards chemistry once I had grasped quantum mechanics and the origin
of the chemical bond.
The thesis work for
my Diploma - in Germany a required step towards the Ph.D. - was performed
in Professor Werner Martienssen's Physical Institute under the supervision
of a young assistant professor Eckhardt Hoenig. Professor Hoenig had just
returned from the United States, where he had worked on highly-sensitive
superconducting detectors, so-called SQUIDS. The aim was to use these
new devices to study the magnetic properties of hemoglobin to derive the
geometry of its bond with oxygen. It was a time of immense joy paired
with intense learning of intricate low-temperature techniques. Hoenig
was a wizard in inventing and building sophisticated instrumentation to
attack physics questions. Gerd Binnig, who later shared the Nobel Prize
for the invention of the Scanning Tunneling Microscope, was another student
of a total of four working with Hoenig at this time in the same lab. It
is probably coincidental, nevertheless, I believe our education in experimental
physics down in this basement of the "Neubau" was second to none and strongly
affected our experimental approaches throughout our careers. Hemoglobin
did not bow to our instruments, at least over the course of a year, and
I quickly performed some measurements on iron impurities in magnesium.
I wrote an unimpressive diploma thesis on the magnetic anisotrophy of
their susceptibility and received the necessary license to start with
a Ph. D. thesis.
At this time, my
horizon unexpectedly widened. It had never occurred to me, nor to many
of my town's youngsters, to go to university anywhere else but Frankfurt
or Darmstadt. We went to the closest one and lived at home, where our
families had been based for generations. However, in the fall of 1974,
a former student from Frankfurt, Wolfgang Kottler, visited. He had since
moved to Grenoble, France, where the Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State
Research in Stuttgart was operating a high-magnetic field facility together
with the French National Center for Scientific Research, CNRS. He was
just finishing his Ph.D. thesis under Professor Hans-Joachim Queisser
and was beating the bushes for his own replacement in Grenoble. Initially
hesitant to make such a big step, moreover to a foreign country, the mastery
of whose language I largely failed in school, I visited Grenoble and asked
myself: Why not?
Going to Grenoble was the single most important step in my life. Leaving
the familiar surroundings of home, diving into another culture, another
language, meeting new people, making new friends was initially frightening,
but eventually immensely educational and gratifying. Meeting my wife,
Dominique Parchet, in Grenoble certainly added to the city's attractions.
Grenoble, at the edge of the Alps, not far from Switzerland was the French
Science City. The magnet lab had been established only a few years back.
Professor Klaus Dransfeld was the local director. There existed a frontier
atmosphere with an exhilarating "can do" sentiment. It was an international
place. Many famous scientists passed through and, due to the informality
surrounding the lab, even the students were able to meet them on a very
personal basis. This was quite different from other, more hierarchically
structured research institutes. In a certain sense, students were kings
at the magnet lab. They knew all the ins and outs of the magnets and the
visiting collaborators were willing to share their scientific knowledge
with them in return. It also was there, I first met Daniel Tsui from Bell
Labs.
My thesis project was to work on the properties of electron hole droplets
in high magnetic fields, a subject that had been proposed by Dieter Bimberg
of the magnet lab. I was joined by Rolf Martin, who had just received
his Ph.D. from the University of Stuttgart. Together we spent hundreds
of immensely enjoyable and very productive research hours - daytime or
nighttime - around the colossal magnets. Sharing a French "villa" with
Ronald Ranvaud, where many distinguished visitors from abroad were often
guests, life revolved totally around science. I finished my thesis in
just over two years and received my Ph.D. from the University of Stuttgart,
where my thesis advisor, Prof. Queisser, now a director at the Max-Planck-Institute
in Stuttgart, held the position of an honorary professor. Instead of the
usual dedication, my thesis had started with a cartoon. I learned only
recently, that this had been a major cause of irritation and that removal
of the cartoon as well as cutting my shoulder-length hair could barely
be warded off.
All through my Ph.D. years, Prof. Queisser had urged me to finish my thesis
swiftly and move on to the United States. He himself had been in the US,
working at Bell Labs and later with Shockley, one of the inventors of
the transistor. Bell Labs, the research arm of American Telephone and
Telegraph (AT&T), was the "Mecca" of solid state research. Strongly encouraged
and supported by my thesis advisor, I had visited Bell Labs and worked
with John Hensel on electron hole droplets for several weeks during the
spring of 1976. The visit was also intended to make contact with Raymond
Dingle of Bell Labs. At the time, he was working on semiconductor quantum
wells, an exciting new area of research made possible by the invention
of molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) in the late '60s by Alfred Cho, also of
Bell Labs. I had heard Dingle speaking on the topic at the 1975 March
meeting of the German Physical Society and had decided that this was the
subject I wanted to pursue. As it turned out Queisser knew Dingle personally
and with partial financial support from the Max-Planck-Institute in Stuttgart
I was accepted into a consultant position in Venky Narayanamurti's Department,
working effectively as a postdoc with Ray Dingle. I moved to Bell Labs
in June 1977.
Modulation-doping, the technique to generate ultra-high mobility two-dimensional
electron systems, instrumental for practically all of my later research,
was conceived about two weeks after my arrival at Bell Labs in a conversation
with Ray Dingle. In his office, he had outlined their recent efforts to
introduce free carriers into semiconductor superlattices and had sketched
the positions of band edges, impurities and electrons on his white-board.
It occurred to me that by placing impurities exclusively into the potential
barriers, while keeping them out of the potential wells, the scattering
of electrons by impurities should be reduced, thus increasing mobilities.
It was a casual, almost trivial observation, which, however, turned out
to have big impact.
Modifications to
the MBE crystal growth instrumentation of Arthur Gossard and his assistant
William Wiegmann to allow for such a selective doping were made over the
course of a few months, and they demonstrated the anticipated gains in
mobilities. Initially, mobilities improved by a mere factor two or three
over conventionally doped superlattices, but they have since grown by
another factor of ~1000. Loren Pfeiffer and Ken West, both from Bell Labs,
have led this effort and have consistently provided the most exquisite
samples for research. Much of our experimental success rests on our direct
access to their "candy store".
Modulation-doping gained me a permanent position at Bell Labs in the fall
1978, and I was soon joined by my long-time assistant, Kirk Baldwin. With
such high-quality material available, many physics experiments - previously
conducted on two-dimensional electron systems in silicon - became feasible
in gallium arsenide. It also opened the door to many optical experiments
on two-dimensional electron systems, largely performed by Aron Pinczuk
and his colleagues at Bell Labs in Holmdel.
At the time, Dan
Tsui of Bell Labs was already recognized as one of the world's leading
experts on two-dimensional electron systems in silicon. He quickly recognized
the potential of the new material for research and invited him on his
frequent trips to the MIT Francis Bitter High Magnetic Field Lab in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. It was the beginning of a scientific collaboration and
personal friendship, which has lasted now for almost 20 years.
The quantum Hall effect, having just been discovered in 1980 by Klaus
von Klitzing, was a major topic of our research. Another topic was the
electron crystal, which was theoretically predicted to form in very low
electron density samples in very high magnetic field. An exceptionally
high quality, low electron density specimen had just been fabricated by
Art Gossard and Willy Wiegmann. Dan Tsui had succeeded in contacting it
electrically, and in October 1981 we took it to the Magnet Lab to look
for signs of an electron crystal. What we discovered instead, during the
evening of October 6, was the fractional quantum Hall effect.
Since this discovery,
many outstanding graduate students (Gregory Boebinger, Robert Willett,
Andrew Yeh, Wei Pan), postdocs (Albert Chang, Hong-Wen Jiang, Rui Du,
Woowon Kang) and colleagues (James Eisenstein, Peter Berglund) joined
us and made discoveries of their own in this fascinating research area.
Other postdocs working with me (Edwin Batke, Rick Hall, Joe Spector, Ray
Ashoori, and Amir Yacoby) have performed research in neighboring areas,
but affected our thinking in lower-dimensional physics in general.
In 1983, I was promoted
to head the department for Electronic and Optical Properties of Solids.
Administration was a minor chore during those days, and I could continue
to pursue my own research, practically full time. They were very exciting
and intense research days during which the fractional quantum Hall effect
and its implications were established in many laboratories around the
world. Theoretical progress was rapid and exhilarating.
In 1991, I was promoted to director of the Physical Research Laboratory,
heading some 100 researchers in eight departments in William Brinkman's
Physics Research Division at Bell Labs. The time available for my own
research dwindled, but I was compensated by becoming exposed to a wide
range of exciting research topics. The initial satisfaction faded when
the physical sciences at Bell Labs came under strong pressure from management
to contract. These were difficult years, not just for me, but much more
so for many of my friends and colleagues at Bell Labs. I was reminded
of Gymnasium and the power of teachers. With the split-up of AT&T in 1996,
the creation of Lucent Technologies, which subsumed Bell Labs, and a change
of leadership, the physical sciences at Bell Labs are blossoming again
today.
I always had thought
of becoming a teacher one day. Being totally immersed in exciting research
at Bell Labs, the idea had faded. It was resurfacing. I stepped down from
my position in the Summer of 1997 and joined Columbia University in January
of 1998 as a Professor of Physics and Applied Physics, while remaining
Adjunct Physics Director at Bell Labs, part-time.
From Les Prix Nobel1998.
|