| Themes > Science > Life Sciences > Physical Anthropology > Evolution Should not be Taught as Fact > Fossil Evidence |
Evolution must surely stand or fall on the fossil records. If living things evolved step by step then there should be millions and millions of fossils of intermediate creatures. That is, the
creatures that have arisen with more complex beneficial mutated genes; the
creatures that show millions and millions of transitional stages between
one species and the next. Where are these intermediate creatures ? Where
are the millions of intermediate fossils of transitional reptiles evolving
into birds? There should be millions more fossils of transitional
creatures than fossils of the perfected species - There is not one ! Never
has a fossil been found of any intermediate transitional creature. The
fossil record shows perfected kinds of species with awesome variation and
unbridgeable gaps separating the kinds. Let us suppose
for the moment that the earth is indeed as old as it is said to be - 4.5
billion years. According to the fossils in the rocks, life began suddenly
in the Cambrian period about five hundred million years ago. The rocks
older than the Cambrian show absolutely no signs of life; nothing except
some vague markings which evolutionists claim are signs of pre-Cambrian
life, but they are controversial and extremely few. Whereas there should
be an immense fossil record of earlier life, evolving for a thousand
million years before that Cambrian explosion of life. Evolution depends
upon a great pre-Cambrian fossil record and the truth is it has never been
found, except for a few vague, disputable markings. Except for this
controversial minority, the Pre-Cambrian rocks are barren and lifeless.
In the Cambrian rock immediately above
them, fossils appear suddenly and by the millions. Suddenly there is an
explosion of teeming life and these are highly specialised creatures
sharply divided into species, genera and families. The earliest fossils
are absolutely disastrous for the theory of evolution. Darwin himself
admitted that this could be an objection to his theory. After the
Cambrian period, new groups of species appear in the rock from time to
time. However, every time a new species or kind appears, even creatures
like the great long neck, the most gigantic fossil ever found, it
appears suddenly; fully perfect and with no link to any previous kind.
There are no fossils of any transitional creatures. Tyrannosaurus Rex was the king; fifty feet
long, twenty feet high with six-inch teeth. Even larger were the long
necks. Diplodocus was ninety feet long. He would need three semi trailers to spread himself out. His feet supported thirty tons. Brachiosaurus was gigantic. Even if
you climbed a tree forty feet high, Brachiosaurus could have lifted
his head and looked you right in the eye. His feet carried fifty tons. The
dinosaurs were colossal and they left colossal fossils. There are no
colossal fossils of something evolving into dinosaurs. If we turn to living creatures again we will find no evidence for evolution. Living creatures prove quite clearly that species do not change no matter how long the supposed time span. Using the supposed time span of these
millions of years, there is a dragonfly species still with us after sixty
million years. The Australian Lung-Fish has not changed in two hundred and
twenty million years; spiders are unchanged in three hundred million
years; cockroaches and silverfish show no change in three hundred and
fifty million years. The Coelacanth fish was recorded as having become extinct seventy million years ago. However, in 1938 a fisherman hauled up a Coelacanth alive and kicking. This, to the evolutionist, is tantamount to a dinosaur walking across the highway. Since then, more Coelacanths have been caught alive, exactly as they were when the last Coelacanth fossil was laid down seventy million years ago. If I tell you that a branch of the Coelacanth family was supposed to turn into an amphibian, you will know that a Coelacanth should have evolution in its blood. It has defied evolution for seventy million years. In summary, living creatures are living evidence against evolution while extinct creatures present a record of unbridgeable gaps. The immense gaps in the fossil record worried world renowned Professor Goldschmidt, who was an eminent geneticist and complete evolutionist. Goldschmidt finally admitted that evolution could not have happened by a slow and gradual change. Rather than admit evolution to be a complete farce, he proposed that it must have happened in very large jumps. Thus was born the theory of the 'hopeful
monster.' Goldschmidt proposed that - on occasion, a creature would
produce an offspring totally different from its parents not only in
appearance, but in actual species. The fossil record is a fatal impediment
towards the theory of evolution.
An inherent weakness lies within this
series:- there is no evidence whatsoever of a relationship; no connection
of one specimen or one link with the next. Each link in the horse theory
is isolated. These are extinct animals found in different parts of the
world, and they are quite likely of different species and genera. At the
bottom is the little Eohyppus, about the size of a fox with several toes
on each foot; Eohyppus - the dawn horse. Was Eohyppus a horse at all? On
the evidence - NO! Several evolutionists, including eminent professor
Gaylord Simpson have admitted that Eohyppus could just as easily be
regarded as the ancestor of other kinds of animals, like the Rhinosaurus,
instead of the ancestor of the horse. Dr. Kerkut has also advised us that the text book pictures of the horse family are imaginative, drawn from the artists imagination. Dr. Kerkut says that the pictures rely on 'faith, rather than evidence'. Nobody knows where Equus came from. Equus has been given different ancestors from different authorities. This shows that his ancestry is unknown. Finally, fossils of the modern Equus have
now been found, dating back to the same time as Eohyppus, our first dawn
horse. Equus and Eohyppus both living at the same time! Do we have to say
more? |
|
|