| Themes > Science > Mathematics > Algebra > Foci of a conic section > Topics and Problems > Differentiation of functions,limits (II), maximum, minimum, inflection points. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two special limitsWithout proof, we accept that
tan(x) sin(x) sin(x) 1
lim ------- = lim --------- = lim ------ .------- = 1.1 = 1
0 x 0 x.cos(x) x cos(x)
Example :
lim ( cot(x) - 1/x) = lim ( 1/tan(x) - 1/x)
0 0
1 - tan(x)/x 1 - 1
= lim (--------------) = ------- = 0
0 tan(x)/x 1
The derivative off(x) for x = aSay G is the graph of f(x) and point P(a,f(a)) is on G. Now, take a point Q(a+h,f(a+h)) on G close to point P.
(f(a+h)-f(a))
The slope of PQ is ---------------
h
This slope can be viewed as the mean slope of G in the curve segment
[PQ].
(f(a+h)-f(a))
the slope of that tangent line = lim --------------
h->0 h
The last limit is called the derivative of f(x) at point P. This value is
noted f'(a).
f(x)Now make the point P from previous section variable. Then
the slope of the tangent line in point P(x,f(x))
(f(x+h)-f(x))
= lim ---------------
h->0 h
= the derivative of f(x)
= f'(x) (notation)
df
= --- (notation)
dx
d
= --- f(x) (notation)
dx
If, for x = b, this limit is not a real number, then we say that the
derivative does not exist for x = b, or that f(x) is not differentiable for x =
b... A function is differentiable in [a,b] if it is differentiable for each x in [a,b]. Differentiable and continuousTheorem:If a function f(x) is differentiable for x = b, then f(x) is continuous for x = b. Proof:
(f(b+h)-f(b))
lim --------------- = a real number = f'(b)
h->0 h
Now,
f(b+h) - f(b)
lim f(b+h) = lim ( ---------------- .h + f(b) )
h->0 h->0 h
f(b+h) - f(b)
lim ( ---------------- .h ) + f(b)
= h->0 h
= f'(b) .0 + f(b)
= f(b)
Let x = b+h ; if h ->0 then x -> b
lim f(x) = f(b)
x->b
And f(x) is continuous in b.
Formulas to calculate the derivative ofA constant functionTake f(x) = c.The slope of the tangent line in point p of a constant function is 0. So,
f(x) = xThe slope of the tangent line in point p of the function x is 1. So,
The sum f(x) + g(x)If the functions f(x) and g(x) are differentiable then
d f(x+h)+g(x+h) -(f(x)+g(x))
-- (f(x)+g(x)) = lim -----------------------------
dx h->0 h
(f(x+h)-f(x)) + (g(x+h)-g(x))
= lim -----------------------------
h->0 h
(f(x+h)-f(x)) (g(x+h)-g(x))
= lim --------------- + lim ---------------
h->0 h h->0 h
d d
= -- f(x) + -- g(x)
dx dx
This property is extendable to the sum of n differentiable functions. The product f(x).g(x)If the functions f(x) and g(x) are differentiable then
d f(x+h).g(x+h) - f(x).g(x)
-- (f(x).g(x)) = lim ---------------------------
dx h->0 h
f(x+h).g(x+h) -f(x+h)g(x) + f(x+h)g(x) - f(x).g(x)
= lim --------------------------------------------------
h->0 h
(g(x+h)-g(x)) (f(x+h)-f(x))
= lim (f(x+h). --------------- + g(x). --------------)
h->0 h h
= f(x).g'(x) + f'(x).g(x)
The product of n differentiable functions.Previous property is extendable to the product of n differentiable functions.Example : u=f(x) v=g(x) w=h(x)
Special productu=f(x) and c is a constant
Power of f(x)u=f(x) is differentiabled n d n-1 --( u ) = --(u.u.u. ... .u) = n.(u ).u' dx dx
The quotient f(x)/g(x)If the functions f(x) and g(x) are differentiable then
d f(x+h)/g(x+h) -(f(x)/g(x))
-- (f(x)/g(x)) = lim -----------------------------
dx h->0 h
f(x+h).g(x) - f(x).g(x+h)
= lim -----------------------------
h->0 h.g(x).g(x+h)
f(x+h).g(x) -f(x)g(x) +f(x)g(x) - f(x).g(x+h)
= lim ---------------------------------------------
h->0 h.g(x).g(x+h)
g(x) . (f(x+h)-f(x))/h - f(x) . (g(x+h)-g(x))/h
= lim ------------------------------------------------
h->0 g(x).g(x+h)
g(x).f'(x) - f(x).g'(x)
= -------------------------
g(x).g(x)
Important special caseu=f(x) is differentiable
n (n-1)
d -n d 1 u . 0 - n.u .u' (-n-1)
--( u ) = -- (---) = --------------------- = -n.u .u'
dx dx n 2n
u u
From this it follows that the formula d n n-1 --( u ) = n.(u ).u' dxholds for all integer values of n. sin(x)
d sin(x+h) - sin(x)
--sin(x) = lim ------------------
dx h->0 h
2.cos(x + h/2).sin(h/2)
= lim ------------------------
h->0 h
cos(x + h/2).sin(h/2)
= lim ------------------------
h->0 h/2
sin(h/2)
= lim cos(x + h/2).--------
h->0 h/2
= cos(x)
cos(x)Analogous as for sin(x) you can prove thatd --cos(x) = - sin(x) dx tan(x)
d d sin(x) cos2(x) - sin(x).(-sin(x))
--tan(x) = --(------) = -----------------------------
dx dx cos(x) cos2(x)
1
= ---------
cos2(x)
cot(x)Analogous as for tan(x) you can prove thatd -1 --cot(x) = --------- dx sin2(x) The chain ruleTake the function f(g(x)) en let u = g(x). Assume that f and g are differentiable.
d f(g(x+h)) - f(g(x))
--(f(g(x)) = lim ------------------
dx h->0 h
f(g(x+h)) - f(g(x)) g(x+h) - g(x)
= lim --------------------. ----------------
h->0 g(x+h) - g(x) h
let g(x+h) = g(x) + k = u + k
f(u + k) - f(u) g(x+h) - g(x)
= lim -------------------. ----------------
h->0 k h
if h -> 0 then k -> 0
f(u + k) - f(u) g(x+h) - g(x)
= lim -------------------. lim ----------------
k->0 k h->0 h
d d
= -- f(u) . -- g(x)
du dx
We can also write
CorollariesAppealing on the chain rule we haved d --sin(u) = -- sin(u) . u' = cos(u) . u' dx du d d --cos(u) = -- cos(u) . u' = - sin(u) . u' dx du d d 1 --tan(u) = -- tan(u) . u' = ---------- . u' dx du cos2(u) d d 1 --cot(u) = -- cot(u) . u' = - -------- . u' dx du sin2(u) d --(un ) = n . (un-1).u' dx ...
The inverse trigonometric functionsFirst take arcsin(x) . We know that for x in [-1,1] sin( arcsin(x) ) = x. (1)So, these two functions must have the same derivative. Thus, we differentiate both sides of (1). From previous formulas we have
d
cos( arcsin(x) ). --( arcsin(x) ) = 1 (2)
dx
But let b = arcsin(x). Then b is in [-pi/2,+pi/2] .
_____________ _______
| 2 | 2
cos(b) = \| 1 - sin (b) = \| 1 - x
________
| 2
Thus, cos( arcsin(x) ) = \| 1 - x
From (2) we can write now :
________
| 2 d
\| 1 - x . --( arcsin(x) ) = 1
dx
d 1
<=> --( arcsin(x) ) = -------------
dx _______
| 2
\| 1 - x
and with the chain rule :
Analogous
Rational power of u = f(x)The n-th root of xFor x > 0 we have
(x(1/n))n= x
So, these two functions must have the same derivative.Thus, we differentiate both sides.
(1/n) n-1 d (1/n)
n.(x ) . -- (x ) = 1
dx
<=> ...
d (1/n) 1 1/n - 1
<=> -- (x ) = ---. (x )
dx n
The n-th root of u = f(x)From previous formula we have
d (1/n) 1 1/n - 1
-- (u ) = ---. (u ).u'
dx n
Rational power of x
d (m/n) d (1/n) m (1/n) m-1 1 1/n - 1
-- (x ) = -- (x ) = m.(x ) . --. (x )
dx dx n
<=> ...
m
<=> = --- . xm/n - 1
n
A rational power of u = f(x)From previous formula we have
d (m/n) m
-- (u ) = --- . um/n - 1.u'
dx n
Logarithmic functionsExponential functionsReal power of xuvPartial derivativesdefinition of partial derivativesSuppose we have a function f such that the image depends on several independent variables, say x, y and z.We write f(x,y,z). Consider, for a moment, in such function f(x,y,z) y and z as constant, then
f(x,y,z) only depends on the variable x. Then, we can calculate the derivative
with respect to x.
fx'(x,y,z)
Similarly we can calculate
fy'(x,y,z) and fz'(x,y,z)
Example of partial derivatives
f(x,y,z) = 3 x y - x z + 6 y -4
fx'(x,y,z) = 3 y - z
fy'(x,y,z) = 3 x + 6
fz'(x,y,z) = - x
Extension of the chain ruleSuppose we have a function f(x,y,z) such that x, y and z are not independent but functions of a variable t. Then f is a function of t.Suppose that x, y and z are differentiable functions of t. We denote the three derivatives for short as x',y' and z'. We can calculate the derivative of f with respect to t with the formula
The proof of this formula is beyond the scope of this tutorial.
Example:
f(x,y,z) = x2 + x.y + z2 + y.z
and x = 3t ; y = 5 t2 ; z = t3
Then
d
--- f(x,y,z) = (2x + y).3 + (x + z). 10t + (2z + y). 3t2
dt
= (6t + 5t2).3 + (3t + t3) .10t + (2t3 + 5t2).3t2
= ...
= 6 t5 + 25 t4 + 45 t2 + 18 t
Implicit DifferentiationImplicit functionsExample :We define the function
x + 6
y = -----
x - 5
If x is not 5, the same function is defined by one the implicit forms y.(x - 5) = x + 6 or x y = x + 5 y + 6 or x y - x - 5 y - 6 = 0 Implicit definition of a functionFrom previous example we see that expressions as
g(x,y) = 0
or g(x,y) = h(x,y)
can define y implicitly as a function of x.
Implicit differentiationConcept of implicit differentiationSuppose that we know that y is implicitly defined as a function of x by the expression
g(x,y) = h(x,y)
If we think y as a function of x, the previous form expresses an identity
for all x-values.Then, the left side is a function of x, and the right side is a function of x and these functions are identical. Therefore the derivative, with respect to x, of both sides is the same. d g(x, y) d h(x, y) --------- = --------- dx dxThis defines implicitly y'. Example of implicit differentiationFrom previous example we know that
x y = x + 5 y + 6
defines y implicitly as a function of x.If we think y as a function of x, the previous form expresses an identity for all x-values. Then, the left side is a function of x, and the right side is a function of x and these functions are identical. Therefore the derivative, with respect to x, of both sides is the same.
1.y + x.y' = 1 + 5 y' + 0
<=>
(x-5) y' = 1 - y
<=>
1 - y
y' = -----
x - 5
Previous procedure to calculate y' is called implicit differentiation
GeneralizationPrevious procedure can be generalized to calculate y' even if the expression
g(x,y) = h(x,y)
defines two or more different y values as a function of x.Example: 2 y = 4x defines two different y values as a function of x.Thinking of y as a function of x, we obtain
2 y y' = 4
<=>
y' = 2/y
This result holds for the two different functions!!
Maximum and minimum valuesRelative maximumWe say that a function f(x) has a relative maximum for x = t if and only if there is a strictly positive real number e such that f(x) =< f(t) for all x in ]t-e,t+e[ .Often the word 'relative' is omitted. Relative minimumWe say that a function f(x) has a relative minimum for x = t if and only if there is a strictly positive real number e such that f(x) >= f(t) for all x in ]t-e,t+e[ .Often the word 'relative' is omitted. Roots of f'(x)
Proof:
f'(x) exists for x = t
(f(t+h)-f(t))
=> lim --------------- = a number g
h->0 h
We consider the right and left limit separately
(f(t+h)-f(t)) (f(t+h)-f(t))
=> lim --------------- = g and lim --------------- = g
> 0 h < 0 h
Since f(x) reaches a maximum for x = t , we have
=> ( g > or = 0 ) and ( g < or = 0 )
=> g = 0
=> f'(t) = 0
In the same way we can prove :
Rolle's theorem
Proof: If f is constant in [a,b], then the proof is trivial. Now, suppose f is not constant in [a,b]. Then there is a number d in ]a,b[ such that f(d) is different from f(a) and f(b). Suppose first that f(d) > f(a). Since f is continuous in [a,b], f attains, according to Weierstrass, a greatest image. Thus, there is a c-value in ]a,b[ such that f(c) is maximum and since f is differentiable in ]a,b[, f'(c) = 0. In the same way, you can prove the theorem for f(d) < f(a).
Lagrange's theorem
C is the graph of y = f(x). Proof: The equation of PQ is
f(b) - f(a)
y - f(a) = -------------- (x - a)
b - a
<=>
f(b) - f(a)
y = f(a) + -------------- (x - a)
b - a
Now, we consider three functions
f : x --> y = f(x)
f(b) - f(a)
g : x --> y = f(a) + -------------- (x - a)
b - a
h : x --> y = f(x) - g(x)
It is not difficult to verify that the h(x) satisfies the three conditions
of Rolle's theorem.
We apply Rolle's theorem on the function h(x). There is a c-value in ]a,b[ such that h'(c) = 0;
h'(x) = f'(x) - g'(x)
f(b) - f(a)
= f'(x) - 0 - ------------- .1
b - a
There is a c-value in ]a,b[ such that
f(b) - f(a)
f'(c) - ------------- = 0
b - a
<=>
f(b) - f(a)
f'(c) = ------------
b - a
Constant functionsTheorem:If f'(x) = 0 for all x in [a,b] Then f(x) is constant in [a,b]. Proof: Since f'(x) exists for each x in [a,b], f'(x) exists in [c,d] and f(x) is
continuous in [c,d].
f(c) - f(d)
f'(e) = -------------
c - d
but f'(x) = 0 for all x in [c,d]. Thus,
f(c) - f(d)
------------- = 0
c - d
and f(c) = f(d)
Increasing functionsTheorem:If f'(x) > 0 for all x in [a,b] Then f(x) is increasing in [a,b]. Proof:
f(c) - f(d)
f'(e) = -------------
c - d
but f'(x) > 0 for all x in [c,d]. Thus,
f(c) - f(d)
------------- > 0
c - d
Since c < d , we have f(c) < f(d).
Decreasing functionsTheorem:If f'(x) < 0 for all x in [a,b] Then f(x) is decreasing in [a,b]. (proof similar to previous theorem) Relative maximum of a differentiable functions.Let e = a strictly positive real number.Suppose that a function is differentiable in ]t-e,t+e[ . If f'(x) > 0 in a suitable interval ]t-e,t[ , the f(x) is increasing at
the left side of t.
Relative minimum of a differentiable functions.Let e = a strictly positive real number.Suppose that a function is differentiable in ]t-e,t+e[ . If f'(x) < 0 in a suitable interval ]t-e,t[ , the f(x) is decreasing at the left side of t. If f'(x) > 0 in a suitable interval ]t,t+e[ , the f(x) is increasing at the right side of t. In that case f(x) has a relative minimum for x = t. Detection of a relative maximum or relative minimumIn general we detect a relative maximum or relative minimum of f(x) by investigating the sign of f'(x).
Example
f(x) = 3x5- 5x3 then f'(x) = 15x4-15x2= 15 x2.(x-1)(x+1)
Investigation of the sign gives
x | -1 0 1
---------------------------------------
f'(x) | + - - +
So there is a maximum for x = -1 and a minimum for x = 1
ConcavityConcave upwardIf, in an interval, f"(x) > 0 , then f'(x) is increasing.Then the slope of the tangent line is increasing with x. We say that f(x) is concave upward in that interval.
Concave downwardIf, in an interval, f"(x) < 0 , then f'(x) is decreasing. Then the slope of the tangent line is decreasing with x. We say that f(x) is concave downward in that interval.
Points of inflectionExample:
f(x) = 3x5- 5x3 then f"(x) = 15(x4 - x2) = 30x(2x2- 1)
Investigation of the sign gives
x | -sqrt(1/2) 0 sqrt(1/2)
----------------------------------------------------
f"(x) | - + - +
So,
for x < -sqrt(1/2) the graph is concave downward.
for -sqrt(1/2) < x < 0 the graph is concave upward.
for 0 < x < sqrt(1/2) the graph is concave downward.
for x > sqrt(1/2) the graph is concave upward.
The points where the concavity changes sign are the points with
x = -sqrt(1/2) ; x = 0 ; x = sqrt(1/2).
These points are called points of inflection.
Theorem of Cauchy
Proof:
Denote
f(b) - f(a)
------------- = K (1)
g(b) - g(a)
Then f(b) - f(a) - K (g(b) - g(a)) = 0
We create the function f(x) - K g(x).This function is continious in [a,b] and the derivative exists in ]a,b[. On this function, we can use Lagrange's theorem . There is a value c in ]a,b[ such that
f(b) - K g(b) - ( f(a) - K g(a) ) = (b-a).(f'(c) - K g'(c))
=> 0 = (f'(c) - K g'(c))
If g'(c) = 0 then f'(c) = 0 and this is impossible because f'(x) and g'(x)
have no common roots in ]a,b[. So, g'(c) is not 0 and then
f'(c)
------ = K (2)
g'(c)
From (1) and (2), we have that there is a value c in ]a,b[ such that
f(b) - f(a) f'(c)
------------- = -------
g(b) - g(a) g'(c)
L'Hospitals rule and special limitsTheorem 1
Proof :
f'(x)
First, suppose that lim ------- = finite = A
a g'(x)
Since f'(x) exists in the environment of a, f(x) is continuous in the
environment of a and
lim f(x) = f(a)
a
But we have also that
lim f(x) = 0
a
Therefore f(a) = 0.
Similarly g(a) = 0.With Cauchy's theorem, we can write in the same environment of a
f(x) f(x) - f(a) f'(c)
----- = ------------- = ------- with c between x and a.
g(x) g(x) - g(a) g'(c)
If x --> a , c --> a.Now we take the limit of both sides for x --> a
f(x) f'(c)
lim ------ = lim ------- = A
a g(x) a g'(c)
And, in this first case, the theorem is proved.
f'(x)
Now, suppose that lim ------- = + infinity
a g'(x)
Then
g'(x)
lim ------- = +0
a f'(x)
and appealing on the first case
g(x) g'(c)
lim ------ = lim ------- = +0
a f(x) a f'(c)
So,
f(x) f'(c)
lim ------ = lim ------- = + infinity
a g(x) a g'(c)
(similar for - infinity)
Theorem 2
Proof:
f'(x)
First, suppose that lim ------- = finite = A
a g'(x)
Consider the identity for all x
f(x) f(x) - f(b) 1 - g(b)/g(x)
----- = -------------. ---------------
g(x) g(x) - g(b) 1 - f(b)/f(x)
Since f'(x) exists in the environment of a, f(x) is continuous in the
environment of a and similarly for g(x).
With Cauchy's theorem, previous identity becomes, with b and x in the same environment of a :
f(x) f'(c) 1 - g(b)/g(x)
----- = ------- . --------------- with c between x and a.
g(x) g'(c) 1 - f(b)/f(x)
If x --> a , c --> a.Now we take the limit of both sides for x --> a
f(x) f'(c) 1 - 0
lim ------ = lim -------. ------ = A
a g(x) a g'(c) 1 - 0
And, in this first case, the theorem is proved.
f'(x)
Now, suppose that lim ------- = + infinity
a g'(x)
Then
g'(x)
lim ------- = +0
a f'(x)
and appealing on the first case
g(x) g'(c)
lim ------ = lim ------- = +0
a f(x) a f'(c)
So,
f(x) f'(c)
lim ------ = lim ------- = + infinity
a g(x) a g'(c)
(similar for - infinity)
Special limits - examplesL'Hospitals rule is frequently used in the following limits.In these examples the properties and the derivatives of exponential and logarithmic functions are used.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|