..Introduction
..Sahelanthropus
tchadensis
..Orrorin
tugenensis
..Ardipithecus
ramidus
..Australopithecus
anamensis
..Australopithecus
afarensis
..Kenyanthropus
platyops
..Australopithecus
africanus
..Australopithecus
garhi
..Australopithecus
aethiopicus
..Australopithecus
robustus
..Australopithecus
boisei
..Homo
habilis
..Homo
erectus
..Homo
ergaster
..Homo
antecessor
..Homo
heidelbergensis
..Homo
sapiens neanderthalensis
..Homo
sapiens sapiens
..Timeline
The word "hominid" refers to
members of the family of humans, Hominidae, which consists of all species
on our side of the last common ancestor of humans and living apes.
Hominids are included in the superfamily of all apes, the Hominoidea,
the members of which are called hominoids.
Although the hominid fossil record is far from complete, and the evidence
is often fragmentary, there is enough to give a good outline of the
evolutionary history of humans.
The time of the split between humans and
living apes used to be thought to have occurred 15 to 20 million years
ago, or even up to 30 or 40 million years ago. Some apes occurring within
that time period, such as Ramapithecus, used to be considered as hominids,
and possible ancestors of humans. Later fossil finds indicated that
Ramapithecus was more closely related to the orang-utan, and new
biochemical evidence indicated that the last common ancestor of hominids
and apes occurred between 5 and 10 million years ago, and probably in the
lower end of that range (Lewin 1987). Ramapithecus therefore is no longer
considered a hominid.
The field of science which studies the
human fossil record is known as paleoanthropology. It is the intersection
of the disciplines of paleontology (the study of ancient lifeforms) and
anthropology (the study of humans).
The species here are listed roughly in
order of appearance in the fossil record (note that this ordering is not
meant to represent an evolutionary sequence), except that the robust
australopithecines are kept together. Each name consists of a genus name
(e.g. Australopithecus, Homo) which is always capitalized,
and a species name (e.g. africanus, erectus) which is always
in lower case. Within the text, genus names are often omitted for brevity.
Each species has a type specimen which was used to define it.
This species was named in July 2002 from
fossils discovered in Chad in Central Africa (Brunet et al. 2002, Wood
2002). It is the oldest known hominid or near-hominid
species, dated at between 6 and 7 million years old. This species is
known from a nearly complete cranium nicknamed Toumai, and a number of
fragmentary lower jaws and teeth. The skull has a very small brain size of
approximately 350 cc. It is not known whether it was bipedal. S.
tchadensis has many primitive apelike features, such as the small
brainsize, along with others, such as the brow ridges and small canine
teeth, which are characteristic of later hominids. This mixture, along
with the fact that it comes from around the time when the hominids are
thought to have diverged from chimpanzees, suggests it is close to the
common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees.
This species was named in July 2001 from
fossils discovered in western Kenya (Senut et al. 2001). The fossils
include fragmentary arm and thigh bones, lower jaws, and teeth and were
discovered in deposits that are about 6 million years old. The limb bones
are about 1.5 times larger than those of Lucy, and suggest that it was
about the size of a female chimpanzee. Its finders have claimed that Orrorin
was a human ancestor adapted to both bipedality and tree climbing, and
that the australopithecines are an extinct offshoot. Given the fragmentary
nature of the remains, other scientists have been skeptical of these
claims so far (Aiello and Collard 2001)
This species was named in September 1994
(White et al. 1994; Wood 1994). It was originally dated at 4.4 million
years, but has since been discovered to far back as 5.8 million years.
Most remains are skull fragments. Indirect evidence suggests that it was
possibly bipedal, and that some individuals were about 122 cm (4'0")
tall. The teeth are intermediate between those of earlier apes and A.
afarensis, but one baby tooth is very primitive, resembling a
chimpanzee tooth more than any other known hominid tooth. Other fossils
found with ramidus indicate that it may have been a forest dweller.
This may cause revision of current theories about why hominids became
bipedal, which often link bipedalism with a move to a savannah
environment. (White and his colleagues have since discovered a ramidus
skeleton which is about 45% complete, but have not yet published on it.)
More recently, a number of fragmentary
fossils discovered between 1997 and 2001, and dating from 5.2 to 5.8
million years old, have been assigned to a new subspecies, Ardipithecus
ramidus kadabba (Haile-Selassie 2001). One of these fossils is a toe
bone belonging to a bipedal creature, but is a few hundred thousand years
younger than the rest of the fossils and so its identification with ramidus
is not as firm as the other fossils.
This species was named in August 1995
(Leakey et al. 1995). The material consists of 9 fossils, mostly found in
1994, from Kanapoi in Kenya, and 12 fossils, mostly teeth found in 1988,
from Allia Bay in Kenya (Leakey et al. 1995). Anamensis existed
between 4.2 and 3.9 million years ago, and has a mixture of primitive
features in the skull, and advanced features in the body. The teeth and
jaws are very similar to those of older fossil apes. A partial tibia (the
larger of the two lower leg bones) is strong evidence of bipedality, and a
lower humerus (the upper arm bone) is extremely humanlike. Note that
although the skull and skeletal bones are thought to be from the same
species, this is not confirmed.
A. afarensis existed between 3.9 and
3.0 million years ago. Afarensis had an apelike face with a low
forehead, a bony ridge over the eyes, a flat nose, and no chin. They had
protruding jaws with large back teeth. Cranial capacity varied from about
375 to 550 cc. The skull is similar to that of a chimpanzee, except for
the more humanlike teeth. The canine teeth are much smaller than those of
modern apes, but larger and more pointed than those of humans, and shape
of the jaw is between the rectangular shape of apes and the parabolic
shape of humans. However their pelvis and leg bones far more closely
resemble those of modern man, and leave no doubt that they were bipedal
(although adapted to walking rather than running (Leakey 1994)). Their
bones show that they were physically very strong. Females were
substantially smaller than males, a condition known as sexual dimorphism.
Height varied between about 107 cm (3'6") and 152 cm (5'0"). The
finger and toe bones are curved and proportionally longer than in humans,
but the hands are similar to humans in most other details (Johanson and
Edey 1981). Most scientists consider this evidence that afarensis was
still partially adapted to climbing in trees, others consider it
evolutionary baggage.
This species was named in 2001 from a partial
skull found in Kenya with an unusual mixture of features (Leakey et al.
2001). It is aged about 3.5 million years old. The size of the skull is
similar to A. afarensis and A. africanus, and has a large,
flat face and small teeth.
A. africanus existed between 3 and 2
million years ago. It is similar to afarensis, and was also bipedal, but
body size was slightly greater. Brain size may also have been slightly
larger, ranging between 420 and 500 cc. This is a little larger than chimp
brains (despite a similar body size), but still not advanced in the areas
necessary for speech. The back teeth were a little bigger than in afarensis.
Although the teeth and jaws of africanus are much larger than those
of humans, they are far more similar to human teeth than to those of apes
(Johanson and Edey 1981). The shape of the jaw is now fully parabolic,
like that of humans, and the size of the canine teeth is further reduced
compared to afarensis.
This species was named in April 1999 (Asfaw et
al. 1999). It is known from a partial skull. The skull differs from
previous australopithecine species in the combination of its features,
notably the extremely large size of its teeth, especially the rear ones,
and a primitive skull morphology. Some nearby skeletal remains may belong
to the same species. They show a humanlike ratio of the humerus and femur,
but an apelike ratio of the lower and upper arm. (Groves 1999; Culotta
1999)
Australopithecus afarensis and africanus,
and the other species above, are known as gracile australopithecines,
because of their relatively lighter build, especially in the skull and
teeth. (Gracile means "slender", and in paleoanthropology is
used as an antonym to "robust".) Despite this, they were still
more robust than modern humans.
A. aethiopicus existed between 2.6
and 2.3 million years ago. This species is known from one major specimen,
the Black Skull discovered by Alan Walker, and a few other minor specimens
which may belong to the same species. It may be an ancestor of robustus
and boisei, but it has a baffling mixture of primitive and advanced
traits. The brain size is very small, at 410 cc, and parts of the skull,
particularly the hind portions, are very primitive, most resembling afarensis.
Other characteristics, like the massiveness of the face, jaws and single
tooth found, and the largest sagittal crest in any known hominid, are more
reminiscent of A. boisei (Leakey and Lewin 1992). (A sagittal crest
is a bony ridge on top of the skull to which chewing muscles attach.)
A. robustus had a body similar to
that of africanus, but a larger and more robust skull and teeth. It
existed between 2 and 1.5 million years ago. The massive face is flat or
dished, with no forehead and large brow ridges. It has relatively small
front teeth, but massive grinding teeth in a large lower jaw. Most
specimens have sagittal crests. Its diet would have been mostly coarse,
tough food that needed a lot of chewing. The average brain size is about
530 cc. Bones excavated with robustus skeletons indicate that they
may have been used as digging tools.
A. boisei existed between 2.1 and
1.1 million years ago. It was similar to robustus, but the face and
cheek teeth were even more massive, some molars being up to 2 cm across.
The brain size is very similar to robustus, about 530 cc. A few
experts consider boisei and robustus to be variants of the
same species.
Australopithecus aethiopicus, robustus
and boisei are known as robust australopithecines, because their
skulls in particular are more heavily built. They have never been serious
candidates for being direct human ancestors. Many authorities now classify
them in the genus Paranthropus.
H. habilis, "handy man",
was so called because of evidence of tools found with its remains. Habilis
existed between 2.4 and 1.5 million years ago. It is very similar to
australopithecines in many ways. The face is still primitive, but it
projects less than in A. africanus. The back teeth are smaller, but
still considerably larger than in modern humans. The average brain size,
at 650 cc, is considerably larger than in australopithecines. Brain size
varies between 500 and 800 cc, overlapping the australopithecines at the
low end and H. erectus at the high end. The brain shape is also
more humanlike. The bulge of Broca's area, essential for speech, is
visible in one habilis brain cast, and indicates it was possibly
capable of rudimentary speech. Habilis is thought to have been
about 127 cm (5'0") tall, and about 45 kg (100 lb) in weight,
although females may have been smaller.
Habilis has been a controversial
species. Originally, some scientists did not accept its validity,
believing that all habilis specimens should be assigned to either
the australopithecines or Homo erectus. H. habilis is now
fully accepted as a species, but it is widely thought that the 'habilis'
specimens have too wide a range of variation for a single species, and
that some of the specimens should be placed in one or more other species.
One suggested species which is accepted by many scientists is Homo
rudolfensis, which would contain fossils such as ER 1470.
H. erectus existed between 1.8
million and 300,000 years ago. Like habilis, the face has protruding jaws
with large molars, no chin, thick brow ridges, and a long low skull, with
a brain size varying between 750 and 1225 cc. Early erectus
specimens average about 900 cc, while late ones have an average of about
1100 cc (Leakey 1994). The skeleton is more robust than those of modern
humans, implying greater strength. Body proportions vary; the Turkana Boy
is tall and slender (though still extraordinarily strong), like modern
humans from the same area, while the few limb bones found of Peking Man
indicate a shorter, sturdier build. Study of the Turkana Boy skeleton
indicates that erectus may have been more efficient at walking than
modern humans, whose skeletons have had to adapt to allow for the birth of
larger-brained infants (Willis 1989). Homo habilis and all the
australopithecines are found only in Africa, but erectus was
wide-ranging, and has been found in Africa, Asia, and Europe. There is
evidence that erectus probably used fire,
and their stone tools are more sophisticated than
those of habilis.
Some scientists classify some African erectus
specimens as belonging to a separate species, Homo ergaster, which
differs from the Asian H. erectus fossils in some details of the
skull (e.g. the brow ridges differ in shape, and erectus would have
a larger brain size). Under this scheme, H. ergaster would include
fossils such as the Turkana boy and ER 3733.
Homo antecessor was named in 1977 from
fossils found at the Spanish cave site of Atapuerca, dated to at least
780,000 years ago, making them the oldest confirmed European hominids. The
mid-facial area of antecessor seems very modern, but other parts of
the skull such as the teeth, forehead and browridges are much more
primitive. Many scientists are doubtful about the validity of antecessor,
partly because its definition is based on a juvenile specimen, and feel it
may belong to another species. (Bermudez de Castro et al. 1997; Kunzig
1997, Carbonell et al. 1995)
Archaic forms of Homo sapiens first
appear about 500,000 years ago. The term covers a diverse group of skulls
which have features of both Homo erectus and modern humans. The
brain size is larger than erectus and smaller than most modern
humans, averaging about 1200 cc, and the skull is more rounded than in erectus.
The skeleton and teeth are usually less robust than erectus, but more
robust than modern humans. Many still have large brow ridges and receding
foreheads and chins. There is no clear dividing line between late erectus
and archaic sapiens, and many fossils between 500,000 and 200,000
years ago are difficult to classify as one or the other.
Neandertal (or Neanderthal) man existed
between 230,000 and 30,000 years ago. The average brain size is slightly
larger than that of modern humans, about 1450 cc, but this is probably
correlated with their greater bulk. The brain case however is longer and
lower than that of modern humans, with a marked bulge at the back of the
skull. Like erectus, they had a protruding jaw and receding
forehead. The chin was usually weak. The midfacial area also protrudes, a
feature that is not found in erectus or sapiens and may be
an adaptation to cold. There are other minor anatomical differences from
modern humans, the most unusual being some peculiarities of the shoulder
blade, and of the pubic bone in the pelvis. Neandertals mostly lived in
cold climates, and their body proportions are similar to those of modern
cold-adapted peoples: short and solid, with short limbs. Men averaged
about 168 cm (5'6") in height. Their bones are thick and heavy, and
show signs of powerful muscle attachments. Neandertals would have been
extraordinarily strong by modern standards, and their skeletons show that
they endured brutally hard lives. A large number of tools and weapons have
been found, more advanced than those of Homo erectus. Neandertals
were formidable hunters, and are the first people known to have buried
their dead, with the oldest known burial site being about 100,000 years
old. They are found throughout Europe and the Middle East. Western
European Neandertals usually have a more robust form, and are sometimes
called "classic Neandertals". Neandertals found elsewhere tend
to be less excessively robust. (Trinkaus and Shipman 1992; Trinkaus and
Howells 1979; Gore 1996)
Modern forms of Homo sapiens first
appear about 120,000 years ago. Modern humans have an average brain size
of about 1350 cc. The forehead rises sharply, eyebrow ridges are very
small or more usually absent, the chin is prominent, and the skeleton is
very gracile. About 40,000 years ago, with the appearance of the
Cro-Magnon culture, tool kits started becoming
markedly more sophisticated, using a wider variety of raw materials
such as bone and antler, and containing new implements for making
clothing, engraving and sculpting. Fine artwork, in the form of decorated
tools, beads, ivory carvings of humans and animals, clay figurines,
musical instruments, and spectacular cave paintings appeared over the next
20,000 years. (Leakey 1994)
Even within the last 100,000 years, the
long-term trends towards smaller molars and decreased robustness can be
discerned. The face, jaw and teeth of Mesolithic humans (about 10,000
years ago) are about 10% more robust than ours. Upper Paleolithic humans
(about 30,000 years ago) are about 20 to 30% more robust than the modern
condition in Europe and Asia. These are considered modern humans, although
they are sometimes termed "primitive". Interestingly, some
modern humans (aboriginal Australians) have tooth sizes more typical of
archaic sapiens. The smallest tooth sizes are found in those areas
where food-processing techniques have been used for the longest time. This
is a probable example of natural selection which has occurred within the
last 10,000 years (Brace 1983).
This diagram shows roughly the times at
which each hominid species lived. Ages are in millions of years, with each
character position representing 100,000 years. This resolution is a little
coarse to accurately represent the most modern species.
Millions of years
7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0
|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | A.robustus ****** | |
| | | | A.boisei ***********| |
| | | A.aethiopicus **** | | |
|****** S.tchadensis| | | | | |
O.tugenensis * | | | | | |
A.r.kadabba ****** | | | | | |
| | A.ramidus * | | | | |
| | A.anamensis **** | | | |
| | A.afarensis ********** | | |
| | | K.platyops * | | | |
| | | A.africanus *********** | |
| | | | A.garhi * | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | H.habilis ********** | |
| | | | | H.erectus **************** |
| | | | | H.antecessor * |
| | | | | archaic H.sapiens *****|
| | | | | | Neandertals **|
| | | | | | modern H.sapiens **
| | | | | | | |
|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
|