City of Boulder Planning, 1996


By Dom Nozzi

Boulder continues to understand the importance of sustainable transportation as the key to livability and sustainability. City Council recently reviewed the update of the Boulder Transportation Master Plan, and recommended "a shift in philosophy, from using a combination of alternate modes and increasing capacity of city streets, to focusing on maintaining existing facilities, improving safety, and increasing transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Expanding streets drops off the list...because studies show the $200 million needed to build another 45 lane miles wouldn't significantly improve congestion by the year 2020."
In an article appearing in the local newspaper, Regina Fisher responded to the claim that Syntex, a local chemical company, is Boulder's number one air polluter: "...I hate to burst your bubble, buddy, but the #1 polluter of Boulder's air is all the cars and trucks on the roadways...I get so sick and tired of all you hippy rejects from the '60s spouting your doomsday propaganda against companies that are associated with chemicals. Syntex goes out of its way to insure that no pollutants enter either the atmosphere or the water systems and should be commended for doing more than merely following the EPA pollution guidelines. If you really want to do some good and reclaim the skies over Boulder, make sure you walk to Syntex on Earth Day..."

To which I say "amen, sister."

Boulder is showing an impressive understanding of the importance of the design of the built environment. The Historic Boulder society will be holding a forum on New Urbanism, demonstrating their understanding of the need for historic preservationists to join forces with the New Urbanists.
In addition, an architect on the city planning staff has initiated a "Downtown Boulder Design Excellence Awards" program. (The awards are intended to increase citizen awareness and appreciation of urban design, to improve downtown urban design, and to improve the pedestrian environment.) Awards are given for outstanding downtown art, alleys, pedestrian and urban spaces, buildings and space shapers, features and gems (this year, this went to a cafe patio rail), signs/graphics/lighting, and (the obligatory) landscape.
On the subject of urban design, I was at an office party on Friday and in a conversation with the city manager was thrilled to hear him point out the importance of focusing on urban design as a quality-of-life strategy. (He was also quite upbeat about Boulder's downtown shuttle bus program, which is expanding due to its popularity.) While discussing Florida, he noted that he felt the horse was largely out of the barn there. I cautioned him about Boulder adopting Florida's concurrency strategies, given the fact that such a tool has been either ineffective or counterproductive in Florida. In my opinion, it has put too much emphasis on a concern for infrastructure capacity, and too little on using urban design principles to protect, create, and restore livable communities. In particular, concurrency has led to the counterproductive concern for road capacity, which creates strong incentives for sprawl and auto dependence, leads to high public expenses to pay for sprawl and auto services, and creates an urban environment that is pleasant for cars but miserable for people. Ironically, road concurrency is not even able to make cars happy, since capacity increases are largely unaffordable. And increases that are made do little more than encourage more auto dependence and higher levels of congestion in the future.
One thing that has struck me as a contrast between Boulder planners and the planners of most other communities is that the Boulder planners are almost entirely composed of advocates and admirers of urbanism, and the concern for pedestrians that such admiration implies.
Planners in most other communities, by contrast, seem to be advocates of suburbanism (or what could also be called car-oriented communities). They call for overly generous landscaping and setbacks, large parks, wide downtown streets, big parking lots in front of buildings, and drive-throughs, for example. The result is deadly for downtowns, because it creates a hostile and unpleasant environment for the pedestrian life that is so vital to a healthy downtown. Of course, such a design makes life more pleasant for the suburban motorists driving into and through downtown. It also creates a vicious cycle in which the increasingly unpleasant downtown encourages a growing number of people to flee to suburbs, which increases citizen demands for a suburbanized downtown. This suburbanization of the community also hurts the viability of small downtown businesses, which must increasingly compete against auto-friendly, regional "big boxes" (such as Wal-Mart and Target) that cater to suburban communities.
One way to define a sustainable community, perhaps, is to evaluate whether the community is destined to be a pleasant place to live in 10 (or 50) years. In looking for yardsticks or benchmarks of sustainability, I would suggest being focused on a fairly concise set of overriding principles, rather than the usual, uninspiring laundry list. In other words, rather than our stating the obvious ("we want good, high-paying, clean-industry jobs, good schools, low crime, a healthy environment," etc.), we need to zero in on a few linchpins that inevitably set us on a path toward achieving our well-known laundry list. Not only can the linchpins be more inspiring, but they can also be more manageable, non-contradictory, and comprehensible than a long and complex set of goals and policies.
One of my favorite "linchpins", as I hinted at above, is the pedestrian-friendly community. When I consider the appropriateness of a development proposal or policy, I like to use the pedestrian as my yardstick. Adopting the pedestrian as our yardstick serves as a linchpin in the following ways:

1- Designing for the pedestrian means promoting compactness, because a sprawled community is an isolating, auto-dependent atmosphere that makes downtowns less pleasant, less safe, and less convenient for pedestrians.

2- Compactness means lower public costs for sprawl subsidies and Band-Aids such as wider roads and inefficiently dispersed utility services, and, conversely, more public dollars available for improving the public realm -- not to mention such things as schools.

3- Promoting a pleasant pedestrian atmosphere allows us to enjoy the benefits of convenient distances between our homes, our work, our schools, our parks, and our shopping. We are able to enjoy the serendipitous discovery of friends and interesting places (hidden to us if we are speeding along in our cars, yet critical to an enjoyable and friendly community).

4- The serendipity of walking means that we interact with our friends and neighbors more often, thereby creating a sense of community that not only makes us feel good, but also helps motivate us to support schools, parks, and other public necessities and amenities. Without a sense of community, we retreat to our cocoons, and become less likely to unite against societal challenges. And our cocoons become breeding grounds for fear and suspicion. (Note also that a vibrant pedestrian atmosphere puts "eyes on the streets," which promotes the citizen surveillance so critical to effective community policing.)

5- Compact, convenient walking distances make travel by bus and bicycle more viable, thereby minimizing the high costs and environmental destructiveness of an auto-dependent community. Convenient walking distances also make life more pleasant for citizens (such as seniors, the poor, children, and the handicapped) who have less access to cars. Without a walkable community, such citizens suffer from high levels of isolation, boredom, and unemployment.

6- By reducing transportation costs, the compact pedestrian community maximizes the purchase of goods and services by local residents (long travel times and distances often discourage people from going to the trouble of traveling to the remote Wal-Mart to make purchases).

7- Less car travel means less air, noise, and water pollution, and less need for environmentally and financially unsustainable road widenings, large parking lots, and large amounts of gasoline consumption.

8- Designing for the pedestrian helps us see the value of strategies that make our community compact enough to be walkable: (a) Retaining compactness with an urban-defining greenbelt and urban service boundary; (b) Allowing only retail and office development that is pedestrian-scaled and centrally located (and, conversely, keeping out the big-box retailers); (c) Designing self-contained neighborhoods (or "urban villages") that provide a full compliment of parks, schools, shopping, and jobs within walking distance of homes; and (d) Designing roads that slow down and otherwise tame cars for the sake of a pleasant and safe pedestrian environment. Similarly, by not widening roads, we eliminate the primary inducement to sprawl and strip commercial development.

9- Streets designed primarily for pedestrians are by their nature streets not designed for high-speed, high-volume vehicle traffic. One result is that the community experiences much less pressure to allow their corridors and gateways to be blighted by loud billboards, glaring lights, bland architecture, huge setbacks, and other forms of obnoxious, screaming strip commercialization. Strip commercial signage, for example, takes advantage of the irresistible "sellscape" created by 40,000 vehicles per day. It is signage that is forced to scream because it must grab the attention of a motorist whizzing by at 45 miles per hour.

10- Designing for pedestrians is, by its nature, designing for a sense of "place." The subtle nooks and crannies of pedestrian-scaled streets and small local businesses is a necessary ingredient for making a place special or otherwise unique. Such uniqueness promotes community pride and a sense of protectiveness. Auto-dependent communities, on the other hand, are inevitably homogenized by gigantic, bland "icon" (or franchise) architecture, and the "Everywhere America" businesses such as K-Mart and Publix—places that care relatively little about the communities they reside in, and which funnel a large percentage of their revenue out of the community.

11- A place that is designed to be wonderful for pedestrians is inevitably a community with a high quality of life. As such, quality businesses flock to the community because their quality employees demand such a life. (Boulder and Raleigh are outstanding examples of this.) And of course, a healthy,

12- diverse local economy serves to reduce crime.

13- By creating an attractive place to live, a compact, pedestrian-friendly community reduces our desire to flee to remote suburbs—which is a primary cause of the astronomical loss of farmland and environmentally significant ecosystems surrounding our cities. (It is in part for this reason that environmentalists must unite with promoters of urbanism to restore, create, and protect livable cities.)

Boulder, Colorado: A Model for a Sustainable City

I moved to Boulder in early 1996. This small city with a high quality of life is nestled into the Boulder Valley with the Rocky Mountain foothills as a backdrop to the west. Looming most prominently and distractingly are the so-called "flatirons," a geologic formation of large, prominent flat slabs of rock that jut boldly into the sky in the western foothills.
The city has protected its compact, quaint size by purchasing over 30,000 acres of open space around the city. This acreage boasts a fantastic network of scenic biking and hiking trails, many of which offer breathtaking views of the city far below in the valley, as well as the continental divide to the west. A vast network of bike trails crisscross the city, with the highly popular Boulder Creek Path serving as the backbone. It is a 10-foot wide paved path running alongside the Boulder Creek, and passes through the heart of the City. The path is largely responsible for restoring water quality and scenic beauty to the Creek, and is the pride and joy of the citizens, who regularly use the trail for walking, biking, rollerblading, jogging, and socializing on a facility that so successfully promotes a sense of community. I, myself, bicycle on the path every day, usually on my way to work.
Went on my first-ever hike on a City of Boulder Open Space trail in 1996. It was an astounding experience. There is a trail-head a mere 5-minute walk from the Victorian house I am renting a bedroom out of that takes you into this series of walking trails that run along valley bottoms and mountain ridges. The views make you feel like you're in the middle of Rocky Mountain National Park, although the large number of hikers from the city makes it a social event as well as a wilderness experience. I had great views of not only the entire Boulder valley, but also the snowy peaks of the continental divide. No wonder the homes are so expensive around here. Make time to hike these trails when you visit Boulder.
I started in early 1996 as an assistant city planner. The Planning Department is doing amazing work, and I'm keeping very busy with my task of controlling the explosive rate of commercial, residential, and industrial development here. I'm also thrilled by the political climate, and the huge number of bike commuters (and the great facilities and incentives for bike, ped, and bus users that makes most "bike-friendly" communities look like non-bicycling communities in comparison).
Amusing bumper sticker of the week: "I ride a bike...and I vote." Given how many people ride bikes here, such a statement is not to be taken lightly.
What ingredients did Boulder use to design a much more sustainable transportation system, as is shown by the relatively high number of bicyclists, pedestrians, and bus riders than most "college town" cities? This, even though each of these cities have similar population sizes and university-town orientation, and even though Boulder's winters are much less hospitable than such cities in the south?
Besides certain obvious factors, such as Boulder maintaining a compact community through its greenbelt and urban growth boundary strategies, Boulder has done a number of things recently to make life safe, pleasant and convenient for pedestrians, bicyclists, and bus riders:

(1) Boulder has installed and retrofitted several miles of striped bicycle lanes on major north-south and east west roads in the central areas of the city. In contrast, most college towns offer a miserable experience for bicyclists, providing few, if any, convenient, safe, and pleasant east-west and north-south routes. In addition, Boulder provides a number of in-street directional signs informing bicyclists which direction to head to find a good bicycle route, has installed one or two barrier-protected bicycle boulevards in the downtown area, connects bike lanes to off-street bike paths when the bike lane ends, and has signs at several intersections that inform you that a turn is prohibited if you are in a car but is allowed if you are on a bicycle.

(2) For novice bicyclists afraid of bicycling in traffic (as well as bicycle commuters looking for a pleasant and sociable atmosphere), Boulder has constructed about 80 miles of off-street greenway trails. The trails are concrete, and range in width from 10 to 14 feet. (Even at these widths, though, they are so popular that they often feel crowded.) One big reason the trails are so popular for not only bicyclists, but also walkers, joggers, skateboarders, rollerbladers, wheelchair users, and picnickers of all age groups, skill levels, and economic classes, is the provision of underpasses and tunnels which completely separate the trails from vehicle traffic. These "grade separations" make the trails significantly safer, more convenient, and more pleasant (studies found that trail use quadrupled when an underpass was installed). As of 1989, there were 22 underpasses and tunnels for trails within city limits, and 15 more were planned. (In fact, I noticed at least a few that were built over the last few years, even though they were not connected to an existing trail. They had been built in anticipation of future trails.) By contrast, I know of only one such facility in Gainesville: The tunnel on SW 13 Street just north of Archer Road. Another important feature of Boulder's trails is that they are permeable. That is, there are several spurs that link the trails to neighborhoods, and when a trail passes under a major road, there is always a spur to get the trail user to and from the road.

(3) Boulder has created a world-famous pedestrian mall downtown. Each day, even during cold and snowy winter days, it is alive with pedestrians enjoying a car-free commercial corridor filled with street vendors, street performers, and the smiling faces of Boulder citizens. Unlike a number of cities where pedestrian malls have failed, Boulder has one that works in large part because of the high concentration of offices, retail and residences in the area, the proximity of the university campus, and the absence of surface parking lots (which create gap-tooth dead zones).

(4) The City has an aggressive program to install "traffic calming" devices on several neighborhood and downtown streets. In place now are a number of traffic circles, speed humps, narrowed streets, necked down intersections, brick crosswalks, and diverters.

(5) The City has equipped all city buses with bike racks, which not only provides bicyclists with a convenient way to get a bicycle to a hard-to-reach location, but also significantly increases the service area for buses, since bicyclists can travel much further than pedestrians to get to a bus stop.

(6) The City (and several other major employers) has instituted a "Way to Go" employee trip reduction program which includes the following:

1- Brochures to employees describing why excessive car travel is undesirable for the community, and how beneficial it is to carpool, bicycle, walk, or take the bus.

2- A monthly raffle drawing in which City employees who travel to work at least once a month by means other than single-occupant vehicle submit a raffle ticket making them eligible for gifts, including cash and round-trip plane tickets.

3- A monthly challenge in which one City department challenges another to see who can have the most employees travel to work at least once a month using an "alternative" travel method. This past month, the Planning Department beat the Law Department by having 100 percent participation. Not only did the director boast about it, but it won us a free pizza lunch.

4- An "eco-pass" program, in which all employees of a participating employer are given a bus pass that enables them to ride the city buses anywhere within the city, as well as to outlying towns, for free. In fact, I used the pass to take the bus to the Denver airport—a one-hour drive that ordinarily costs $8 by bus.

5- A guaranteed ride home program which provides "alternative travel" City employees with a free taxi ride home in case of an emergency of unplanned schedule change.

6- Free City employee parking for employees who carpool (and a $10 subsidy per month if the carpool includes 3 or more riders).

7- A pool car made available to City employees for work-related trips during the day.

8- A GIS-based program which gives City employees a map and office phone numbers of other employees who live near them and may be interested in ridesharing.

9- An informal policy that allows supervisors to let City employees work at home (telecommuting).

10- A policy that allows City employees to opt for a compressed work week, which enables an employee to work less than 5 days per week.

11- 19 City pool bikes located in 13 City departments, which employees can use for errands.

12- A bike reimbursement program, which allows City employees who use a bike for work-related activities to be reimbursed up to 30 cents per mile for such trips.

13- A City policy that encourages employees to dress casually on Friday, thereby making it easier to use an alternative travel method.

14- A free shuttle bus that continuously circles the downtown core of the city.

15- A once-a-year "bike week," when everyone is encouraged to bicycle to work for the entire week. A number of incentives are offered to enable the City to achieve a participation rate in the thousands.

There is nothing mystical about why communities such as Boulder have much higher levels of bicyclists, pedestrians, and bus riders than other college towns, and why, therefore, Boulder's urban area is safer, more convenient, more sustainable, and more pleasant than similar cities. Providing a full range of facilities, programs, and incentives is an effective way to reduce excessive levels of auto travel, and ensures that the City will have a less costly, more sustainable future.

From "Planning" magazine:

Boulder, Colorado, is famous for pushing the planning envelope. Here's a place that puts moratoriums on both housing and business development while sorting out its growth strategies. During a 1993 moratorium the city launched a six-month visioning effort that has won a special citation for comprehensive planning.
The Integrated Planning Project aimed to combine land use, transportation, housing, economic, and environmental policies into a single strategy. It did so by offering residents various scenarios for the city's future, one based on existing planning and zoning policies plus four alternatives.
As it turned out, the people's choice was moderate growth. Responding to various city surveys, they said they favored a population increase of 8 to 13 percent by 2020 -- up from 91,000 in '93 to between 98,000 and 103,000. By 1994, the City Council had adopted policies to make that choice a reality. Among them: annex sparingly, issue fewer residential building permits annually, and limit land supply for business and industrial growth.


Information provided by: http://user.gru.net/domz/bldr.htm