Nuclear energy production is accompanied by production of radioactive
wastes of different nature:
- Fission products
- Activation products obtained from
neutron capture by nuclei belonging to the structure of the reactor,
such as, for example, Cobalt 60.
- Transuranic nuclei obtained from neutron
capture by the nuclear fuel.
Nuclear wastes are characterized by their
radiotoxicity and their life-time. Only wastes with life-times exceeding
about ten years are associated to significant storage problems. These are
essentially some fission products and transuranic elements. Fission
products decay by
radiation, while transuranic elements decay essentially through
radiation. For the same disintegration rate,
emitters are much more radiotoxic than
emitters. It follows that the main nuclear waste problem is that of
transuranic elements.
Two different strategical approaches are
proposed for high activity nuclear wastes disposal:
- Direct spent fuel elements underground
storage, without any reprocessing.
- Spent fuel reprocessing with the aim of
optimized extraction of transuranics and fission products and their
transmutation by nuclear reactions into less radiotoxic or short lived
species. Here we examine this strategy in more details, especially in
the French context which appears to be one of its more systematic
approach.
Available nuclear reactions for nuclear
waste processing are of two types:
- Transmutation which, by neutron capture,
transforms a radioactive nucleus into a stable one. This method is
suitable for fission products. As stable nuclei could be,
simultaneously, transformed into radioactive ones, the method requires
an initial separation of the isotopes to be transmuted. This
separation is still not available on an industrial scale.
- Incineration which amounts to nuclear
fission following neutron capture. This method is suitable for
transuranic elements. It is always associated to energy and neutron
production. It is already applied, at an industrial scale to
Plutonium.
The Plutonium case. From the
preceding Plutonium can be considered according to two different view
points. In the breeding strategy it is a nuclear fuel. In normal PWR
reactors it appears to be a nuclear waste which is apt to be incinerated.
Incineration is possible with thermal reactors like PWR, but, as will be
seem below, it cannot be complete in this case. Indeed, it is associated
with the production of transplutonic elements( Americium and Curium) which
cannot be incinerated in PWR. |