Themes > Science > Physics > Mechanics > Lagrangian and Hamiltonian field theories > Poisson brackets and symplectic form

A binary operation tex2html_wrap_inline3405 , called Poisson brackets, is introduced for functions on the phase space:

  eqnarray224

In terms of Poisson brackets the Hamiltonian equations can be rewritten as

displaymath3407

Exercise: prove, that for any function A(t,x,p) the following identity (Liouville equation) is valid:

displaymath3411

Poisson brackets have the following properties:

1. Skew symmetry: tex2html_wrap_inline3413 .

2. Linearity: tex2html_wrap_inline3415 for constants tex2html_wrap_inline3417 .

3. Leibniz identity: tex2html_wrap_inline3419 .

4. Jacoby identity: tex2html_wrap_inline3421 .

In axiomatic way, the Poisson brackets can be defined as any binary operation, satisfying these 4 properties. Axioms 2,3 are equivalent to tex2html_wrap_inline3423 . Therefore, the Poisson brackets, being introduced on some complete set of variables tex2html_wrap_inline3425 , can be defined for any functions:

displaymath3427

Particularly, in transformation tex2html_wrap_inline3429 to a new complete set, the matrix tex2html_wrap_inline3431 is multiplied by Jacoby matrices from left and right. Variables (x,p), for which tex2html_wrap_inline3435 (and consequently (1) is valid), are called canonical basis. There is a theorem (Darboux), which states that for any tex2html_wrap_inline3437 a transformation to canonical basis tex2html_wrap_inline3439 exists, at least locally in a vicinity of a given point tex2html_wrap_inline3441 . Such transformation is not unique, because non-trivial transformations exist, called canonical transformations, which conserve Poisson brackets. They can be applied after some canonical basis was found.

Exercise: for 2-dimensional phase space (x,p) find all canonical transformations.

Answer: arbitrary area conserving transformation of the plane.

  The described construction allows to think about Hamiltonian mechanics as a kind of geometry, introduced in the phase space. The matrix tex2html_wrap_inline3437 defines a transformation of any vector to orthogonal one: tex2html_wrap_inline3447 , ab(a)=0, due to skew symmetry of tex2html_wrap_inline3431 . The Hamiltonian H creates a field of gradients tex2html_wrap_inline3455 , which is transformed by tex2html_wrap_inline3431 to a field of velocities: tex2html_wrap_inline3459 . Subsequent integration gives the phase trajectories (note that all they automatically lye on the surface H=Const, Hamiltonian is conserved in evolution).

 

 

figure262

 

In this way Hamiltonian generates the phase flow. Moreover, any function on the phase space, being used as Hamiltonian, generates some phase flow. All variables in Hamiltonian theory have double role: as tex2html_wrap_inline3463 -valued functions on the phase space and as generators of some transformations.

Exercise: what transformations are generated by z-components of momentum tex2html_wrap_inline3465 and angular moment tex2html_wrap_inline3467 ?

Answer: shifts of tex2html_wrap_inline3469 along z and rotations of tex2html_wrap_inline3473 about z.

The matrix tex2html_wrap_inline3431 can be considered as skew symmetric metric in the phase space. Canonical transformations are motions (metric conserving transformations). While a symmetric metric defines a Riemann structure in the space, the skew symmetric metric gives a symplectic structure.

  Definition: Let tex2html_wrap_inline3479 (due to skew symmetry of tex2html_wrap_inline3431 this is possible only in even dimensional space). Let tex2html_wrap_inline3483 be inverse to tex2html_wrap_inline3485 . A differential 2-form

displaymath3487

is called symplectic form on the phase space. More information on differential forms can be found in [1],[2]. Here we should only know that the operation tex2html_wrap_inline3489 (outer product) is skew symmetric: tex2html_wrap_inline3491 and operation d (outer derivative) has properties: tex2html_wrap_inline3495 , tex2html_wrap_inline3497 .

Note: form with zero outer derivative tex2html_wrap_inline3499 is called closed, form represented as an outer derivative tex2html_wrap_inline3501 is called exact. Exact form is necessarily closed. Converse is not always true, look to [2] for details.

Exercise: show that Jacoby identity is equivalent to closeness of the form: tex2html_wrap_inline3499 .


Sketch of the solution.

Due to Jacoby identity, a term tex2html_wrap_inline3505 , being summed over cyclic permutations of (ijk), gives zero. Multiplying this sum to tex2html_wrap_inline3509 and using the identity tex2html_wrap_inline3511 , obtain that tex2html_wrap_inline3513 , summed over the cyclic permutations of (ijk), is zero. On the other hand, the derivative of symplectic form:

displaymath3517

Here tex2html_wrap_inline3519 is not changed in the cyclic permutations. Summing over them, obtain tex2html_wrap_inline3499 .


  The symplectic form was introduced for the following purpose. Let's consider a surface in the space. A metric, introduced in the whole space, induces a metric on the surface. For Riemann structure: if we are able to calculate angles and distances in the whole space, we can do this on the surface also. Formally, if the surface is specified parametrically as tex2html_wrap_inline3523 , the scalar product

displaymath3525

In the same way the symplectic form introduced in the whole phase space induces a symplectic form on the surface:

displaymath3527

Due to the specifics of our problems, we will often use this property.


Information provided by: http://viswiz.gmd.de