| Themes > Science > Life Sciences > Physical Anthropology > Pre-Historic Man > Human Antiquity Update > Another blow for Out of Africa? | ||
|
![]() |
| Nanjing man |
Another Australian study - this
time of Chinese fossils - has weighed into the controversy over the
origins of modern humans, supporting the theory they evolved in many
different regions of the world.
Dr Jian-xin Zhao and Professor Ken Collerson from the University
of Queensland (UQ) have dated ancient human fossils in China as being
at least 620,000 years old - much older than previously thought.
The researchers from the Earth Sciences Department say the findings
support the theory that Asian populations evolved directly from Asian Homo
Erectus, rather than evolving from populations out of Africa.
A major argument against this regional continuity theory, Dr Zhao told ABC
Science Online, is that the age of Homo Erectus fossils found in
Asia did not allow enough time for Homo Sapiens to evolve.
"This new date gives plenty of time for Home Erectus to evolve
into Homo Sapiens," he says.
The researchers measured the decay of uranium into thorium in samples of
calcite flowstone directly above recently discovered Homo Erectus
fossils called Nanjing Man, in the Tangshan Cave 250 kilometres northwest
of Shanghai.
In the past this method has been used to date teeth and bones, however the
researchers say applying it to calcite flowstone samples has provided much
more accurate dates and challenged the reliability of using fossil teeth
for the purposes of dating.
"Age estimates derived from teeth or bones depend very much on how
and when uranium was taken up during fossilisation process, and are often
younger than the true ages," Professor Collerson says. "In
contrast, the University of Queensland dates were derived from dense and
pure crystalline flowstone that was closed to uranium and thorium mobility
and are therefore more reliable."
The findings, developed in collaboration with Dr Kai Hu and Dr Han-kui Xu
from Nanjing, were published recently in the international journal Geology.
Information provided by: http://www.abc.net.au